[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 06/13] x86/EFI: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10
On 29/08/23 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote: I don't think a simple comment is enough to say that "precautions have been taken". For the moment, I will drop this change to keep this patch going.On 28.08.2023 15:20, Simone Ballarin wrote:Add inclusion guards to address violations of MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10 ("Precautions shall be taken in order to prevent the contents of a header file being included more than once"). Mechanical change. Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h | 6 ++++++ xen/arch/x86/efi/runtime.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h index 92f4cfe8bd..2c6be062cc 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ * is intended to be included by common/efi/boot.c _only_, and * therefore can define arch specific global variables. */ + +#ifndef __X86_EFI_EFI_BOOT_H__ +#define __X86_EFI_EFI_BOOT_H__Considering the comment, I find the need for a guard here quite "interesting", to be honest. Jan -- Simone Ballarin, M.Sc. Field Application Engineer, BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |