[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/6] xen/vpci: support ro mask
- To: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:58:34 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=blwhiB6YHT2OIUW5VwCY2Gkuf2PyeRE4rYDNNgZihUY=; b=ZDRiKHi4nSkWrIVA6GlH83FheT6HTGS3fyo09zyYOKiJ+3uwJbrwL1mV2CrJo+j+4MlCrlvCAlbKDyxzTHSxi2kOBhFqWLBGshKNEZ8g3fh0kQaHiG7x+f1wh/Sv3FMKh1yoocefuaP7Y3QAa9NHcDuO3vrpTN80UWSwWoYr4w4w0V1F59Aw5aHO/aiMX9Upcl+xomvvkyaAHVNVPTjxatMjzmIbI6bVU4vh1nxFaLfMsgLDQil6yzidwc5p2T2G1ziGFh5FMZK66e/L65VoqXc2iE9P7+lE/upRFzfsHTM3dGKAQlL63FLyIvCEMb/JqSb5b0OyN0HcGgUj+GLfaA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EEI9gJBT2nXU3BT9Rodq8eBv2KdYm6X82iLH4ru+v9qPEc/+kHZQo93+WI7Ct1jRwFMBMQf0G7ITCKcbDXfqIGavcGqiWr+stH5TDW4kFA6eTRpp4iQBOy91x6VT2PuVie3JilAjDNrc68SA7FR0VqhHblOGAuy8mDgginlYadMugMBDJH0BQrkwUMQ/eMLVP0kMyueEuIyUvR7T1scDzCvADWpncjWG+FRlNYpQ6hVHJmT4bPvOcZpnb6Q6kCXpSpeowbVlUouGvKpKhfKlKV4rgIpNHSEMgQcZDY+/vPkF3U2EgBwGxYHFGon4mLI3U+m/xLRMdiaHEVtRrm/Zug==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:58:52 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 28.08.2023 19:56, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> Add support for a read-only bit mask for vPCI register handlers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3->v4:
> * new patch
>
> RFC: It seemed like a low-hanging fruit to add support for ro mask. Let me
> know
> what you think, and I could squash it into the status handler patch for
> the
> next version of the series.
I'd be fine having both in one go, fwiw.
Jan
|
