[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: xen | Failed pipeline for staging-4.15 | 3a9a2901
On 20.09.2023 12:50, GitLab wrote: > > > Pipeline #1010772231 has failed! > > Project: xen ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen ) > Branch: staging-4.15 ( > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/commits/staging-4.15 ) > > Commit: 3a9a2901 ( > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/commit/3a9a2901cc8b24f28dbdc6fb63f57006c77a1f47 > ) > Commit Message: x86/shadow: defer releasing of PV's top-level s... > Commit Author: Jan Beulich ( https://gitlab.com/jbeulich ) > Committed by: Andrew Cooper ( https://gitlab.com/andyhhp ) > > > Pipeline #1010772231 ( > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/pipelines/1010772231 ) triggered by > Ganis ( https://gitlab.com/ganis ) > had 19 failed jobs. I'm somewhat puzzled here, in two ways: > Job #5127621914 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621914/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-stretch-clang-debug > Job #5127621916 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621916/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-stretch-gcc This one failed with In file included from /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/qemu/timer.h:4:0, from /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/qemu/timed-average.h:29, from /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/block/accounting.h:28, from /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/block/block_int.h:27, from /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/block/file-posix.c:30: /usr/include/linux/swab.h: In function '__swab': /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/qemu/bitops.h:20:34: error: "sizeof" is not defined [-Werror=undef] #define BITS_PER_LONG (sizeof (unsigned long) * BITS_PER_BYTE) ^ /builds/xen-project/xen/tools/qemu-xen-dir/include/qemu/bitops.h:20:41: error: missing binary operator before token "(" #define BITS_PER_LONG (sizeof (unsigned long) * BITS_PER_BYTE) ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors What? How can "sizeof" no be "defined"? > Job #5127621965 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621965/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: opensuse-leap-clang-debug > Job #5127621939 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621939/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-32-gcc-debug > Job #5127621913 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621913/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-stretch-clang > Job #5127621924 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621924/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-clang-debug > Job #5127621934 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621934/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-gcc-debug-randconfig > Job #5127621930 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621930/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-gcc-debug > Job #5127621928 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621928/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-gcc > Job #5127621937 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621937/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-32-clang-debug > Job #5127621974 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621974/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-gcc-arm64 > Job #5127621975 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621975/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: debian-unstable-gcc-debug-arm64 > Job #5127621964 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621964/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: opensuse-leap-clang > Job #5127621892 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621892/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: archlinux-gcc-debug > Job #5127621889 ( https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/jobs/5127621889/raw ) > > Stage: build > Name: archlinux-gcc This one exhibits what e35138a2ffbe ("rombios: Work around GCC issue 99578") addresses, yet 4.16, which also doesn't have that backport, succeeded earlier on. Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |