[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] docs/misra: add 14.3
Actually adding Henry On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi Henry, > > This patch is now acked. Should it go in 4.18? > > In terms of risk of breaking, it is zero as nothing builds or runs based > on this document. > > At the same time, the benefit is also low because the main value of this > document is for future coding changes that would be too late now for > 4.18. So the benefits of committing it now are ease of keeping track of > the change and positive PR when we make the 4.18 release and we talk > about the total number of MISRA C rules we adopted. > > > > On Fri, 8 Sep 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > > > > Add 14.3, with project-wide deviations. > > > > Also take the opportunity to clarify that parameters of function pointer > > types are expected to have names (Rule 8.2). > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > - add , > > - add switch(sizeof(...)) and switch(offsetof(...)) > > --- > > docs/misra/rules.rst | 15 ++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/docs/misra/rules.rst b/docs/misra/rules.rst > > index 34916e266a..ac76e20a9c 100644 > > --- a/docs/misra/rules.rst > > +++ b/docs/misra/rules.rst > > @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. > > * - `Rule 8.2 > > <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_08_02.c>`_ > > - Required > > - Function types shall be in prototype form with named parameters > > - - > > + - Clarification: both function and function pointers types shall > > + have named parameters. > > > > * - `Rule 8.3 > > <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_08_03.c>`_ > > - Required > > @@ -385,6 +386,18 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. > > - A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type > > - > > > > + * - `Rule 14.3 > > <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_14_03.c>`_ > > + - Required > > + - Controlling expressions shall not be invariant > > + - Due to the extensive usage of IS_ENABLED, sizeof compile-time > > + checks, and other constructs that are detected as errors by MISRA > > + C scanners, managing the configuration of a MISRA C scanner for > > + this rule would be unmanageable. Thus, this rule is adopted with > > + a project-wide deviation on if, ?:, switch(sizeof(...)), and > > + switch(offsetof(...)) statements. > > + > > + while(0) and while(1) and alike are allowed. > > + > > * - `Rule 16.7 > > <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_16_07.c>`_ > > - Required > > - A switch-expression shall not have essentially Boolean type > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |