[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] domain: fix misaligned unmap address in unmap_guest_area()
Hi Roger, On 06/10/2023 10:13, Roger Pau Monne wrote: unmap_domain_page_global() expects the provided address to be page aligned, or else some of the called functions will trigger assertions, like modify_xen_mappings() on x86 or destroy_xen_mappings() on Arm. The following assert has been reported by osstest arm 32bit tests: (XEN) Assertion 'IS_ALIGNED(s, PAGE_SIZE)' failed at arch/arm/mm.c:1243 (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.18-rc arm32 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) PC: 00271a38 destroy_xen_mappings+0x50/0x5c [...] (XEN) Xen call trace: (XEN) [<00271a38>] destroy_xen_mappings+0x50/0x5c (PC) (XEN) [<00235aa8>] vunmap+0x30/0x1a0 (LR) (XEN) [<0026ad88>] unmap_domain_page_global+0x10/0x20 (XEN) [<00208e38>] unmap_guest_area+0x90/0xec (XEN) [<00208f98>] domain_kill+0x104/0x180 (XEN) [<00239e3c>] do_domctl+0x8ac/0x14fc (XEN) [<0027ae34>] do_trap_guest_sync+0x570/0x66c (XEN) [<002019f0>] arch/arm/arm32/entry.o#return_from_trap+0/0x4 Fixes: eadc288cbb0d ('domain: map/unmap GADDR based shared guest areas') Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> --- unmap_domain_page_global() and vunmap() should likely have the same alignment asserts, as not all paths lead to detecting the misalignment of the provided linear address. Will do a separate patch. unmap_domain_page() seems to be able to deal with unaligned pointer. And supporting unaligned pointer in vunmap()/unmap_domain_page_global() would simplifyy call to those functions. So I would consider to deal with the alignment rather than adding ASSERT() in the two functions. destroy_xen_mappings() and modify_xen_mappings() should stay as-is though. Anyway, I don't think this is a 4.18 material. --- xen/common/domain.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c index b8281d7cff9d..2dcc64e659cc 100644 --- a/xen/common/domain.c +++ b/xen/common/domain.c @@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ void unmap_guest_area(struct vcpu *v, struct guest_area *area)if ( pg ){ - unmap_domain_page_global(map); + unmap_domain_page_global((void *)((unsigned long)map & PAGE_MASK)); Looking at the code, I can't find where 'map' may have become unaligned. Do you have a pointer? Depending on the answer, the call in map_guest_area() may also need some adjustment. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |