[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v10 15/17] xen/arm: account IO handlers for emulated PCI MSI-X
Hi, On 13/10/2023 14:06, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: Hi Julien, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> writes:Hi Volodymyr, On 12/10/2023 23:09, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> At the moment, we always allocate an extra 16 slots for IO handlers (see MAX_IO_HANDLER). So while adding IO trap handlers for the emulated MSI-X registers we need to explicitly tell that we have additional IO handlers, so those are accounted. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>Some process remark. All the patches you send (even if they are unmodified) should also contain your signed-off-by. This is to comply with point (b) in the DCO certificate:Oh, sorry. I assumed that it is enough to have signed-off-by tag of the original author. I'll add my tags in the next version. Thanks! https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cert-manager.io/docs/contributing/sign-off/__;!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!0mzdEfHOZMm2OmzFc6TZukGgMYRHxDWLdEQvbhUlDmOg3tZNeDbWb8vHz38zLzcYv8GUZeHLn-5sWTYCkvkb$ [cert-manager[.]io] Please check the other patches in this series.Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>Is this patch depends on the rest of the series? If not we can merge it in the for-4.19 branch Stefano created. This will reduce the number of patches you need to resend.It uses VPCI_MAX_VIRT_DEV constant which was introduced in ("vpci: add initial support for virtual PCI bus topology"). Ok. I will wait before committing. Please let me know if there are any Arm patches that can be already committed (or could potentially be reviewed independently). Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |