[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] xen/arm: Enlarge identity map space to 10TB
On 16/10/2023 09:44, Michal Orzel wrote: Hi, Hi, Xen may have booted on that platform before hand. So this would be considered a regression and therefore a tag would be warrant.On 13/10/2023 14:26, Leo Yan wrote:On ADLink AVA platform (Ampere Altra SoC with 32 Arm Neoverse N1 cores), the physical memory regions are: DRAM memory regions: Node[0] Region[0]: 0x000080000000 - 0x0000ffffffff Node[0] Region[1]: 0x080000000000 - 0x08007fffffff Node[0] Region[2]: 0x080100000000 - 0x0807ffffffff The UEFI loads Xen hypervisor and DTB into the high memory, the kernel and ramdisk images are loaded into the low memory space: (XEN) MODULE[0]: 00000807f6df0000 - 00000807f6f3e000 Xen (XEN) MODULE[1]: 00000807f8054000 - 00000807f8056000 Device Tree (XEN) MODULE[2]: 00000000fa834000 - 00000000fc5de1d5 Ramdisk (XEN) MODULE[3]: 00000000fc5df000 - 00000000ffb3f810 Kernel In this case, the Xen binary is loaded above 8TB, which exceeds the maximum supported identity map space of 2TB in Xen. Consequently, the system fails to boot. This patch enlarges identity map space to 10TB, allowing module loading within the range of [0x0 .. 0x000009ff_ffff_ffff]. Fixes: 1c78d76b67 ("xen/arm64: mm: Introduce helpers to prepare/enable/disable")I don't think a fixes tag applies here given that 2TB was just a number we believed is enough and all of this is platform dependent. This can be dropped on commit if committer agrees AFAICT, the commit is only present on the upcoming 4.18. So the question is whether Xen 4.17 booted out-of-the-box on ADLink? If the answer is yes, then we need to add a Fixes tag. But the correct one would be 1c78d76b67e1 ("xen/arm64: mm: Introduce helpers to prepare/enable/disable the identity mapping"). We would also need to consider it as a candidate for Xen 4.18 because we would regress boot on ADLink. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |