Re: [XEN PATCH][for-next v2 5/8] x86/io_apic: address violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1

[Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/10/2023 17:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > The definition of IO_APIC_BASE contains a sum of an essentially enum
> > value (FIX_IO_APIC_BASE_0) that is positive with an index that, in all
> > instances, is unsigned, therefore the former is cast to unsigned, so 
> > that
> > the operands are of the same essential type.
> >
> > No functional change.
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> Oh, also - there's no S-o-b here.
>
> Jan
Ah, good catch.

--
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)