[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xen 4.18 pvshim console issue (with patch)


  • To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:51:54 +0200
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=lkNEBhG7rcEnDVwA1niXvg2PwbH6SuF1n2O2ilgP6HU=; b=bBj3Oih2ap+WnM3+6UN83U1W/U1PkHL3jiordLH6r+dWYb36xuzvEwygxXPhnrgdrn/zJqKufEnCkpfqhpo83m5KsumQAG59jUx5aEyCu3iwdVS1/KXZYLrWL/8AfinTCl6fBx2gkQzIWVbxouQolMxrKDMjUT8vd6zp2pPxn8jYAW99P2+fFey3kZIv07cdN5C6i0aFZVfAbLEUxlh9zOJHeOLQQ3962wPSRaN01TaRI6Riz4hmRenw8bFV6OcnG+qyS4Z5qUhW72/R4cXWomb2AFCimAzjtX1huDIohfuW825ltaaaCaLFv2iUVa+KWwGtmK/vIsAttNrw3IUT4g==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jiJcoeweKB1S8R1gCeLbQmjf1ZjWXcsEHJ37IfnrNcpRKdzyQgI/AIrD5+OKKVZcQGWhD13aZydUwpYOCcpOpwZeV1k2uzYFpDPgbw93yBn8DeYgwNPiJWQu8avyZp6vEWm0ikGUsml/iELrgm2YAGAIuQ6ZPziW8RzsBVXRB998VDGvrzeZH30h+mcTwOqjkl6eHnQ16Am1aYEnOuJvkAGKSSrv8HNk7QMklFWfLqytjn+YKMeFiZzyvFtBplG97Fp5FXomjRvgh9vsrmoAEIE4xRUIkehpVxGMAIO3zhqiJwhyVdbqD6zbmISSOvHOoClscDaWAciuBnT2uErdhA==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:52:10 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 18.10.2023 15:36, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.10.2023 13:20, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 18/10/2023 11:38 am, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> With Xen 4.18, a PV domain running under pvshim doesn't get console input.
>>>>> This is because the domain id in pvshim isn't 0 (and on x86 
>>>>> max_init_domid is
>>>>> hardwired to 0), so console_input_domain() will never select that domain
>>>>> as input.
>>>>>
>>>>> The attached patch fixes it by translating 0 to the real domain id for
>>>>> pvshim, but there may be a better way to do this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thankyou for the report.
>>>>
>>>> First, CC'ing Henry as 4.18 release manager.
>>>>
>>>> There have been changes in how this works recently in 4.18, notably c/s
>>>> c2581c58bec96.
>>>
>>> Yes, it looks like this one introduced the problem.
>>> Before this, we would switch console_rx to 1 without checking if
>>> domain (console_rx - 1) exists, and console_rx == 1 is a special case
>>> in __serial_rx()
>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, it's not obvious whether this worked in 4.17 or not.  i.e.
>>>> whether it's a regression in 4.18, or whether it's been broken since PV
>>>> Shim was introduced.
>>>
>>> I don't know for 4.16 or 4.17 but I can tell that it's working in 4.15
>>
>> >From looking at the code, it doesn't look like it would: There
>> switch_serial_input() toggles console_rx between 0 and 1 afaict, and
>> console_input_domain() handles value 0 as "Xen" (like in 4.18), while
>> otherwise it calls rcu_lock_domain_by_id(console_rx - 1) (i.e. trying
>> to get hold of Dom0's domain structure, not Dom1's).
> 
> Well, I have a 4.15.5 installation in production and I can tell you that
> with PV+PVSHIM, the console is working, for sure.
> 
> AFAIK console_input_domain() is called only on ARM, from
> vpl011_write_data_xen(). It's never called for x86.

Oh, indeed. I took your patch touching the function as meaning it's used
on x86. This then means my earlier suggestion won't work, as we need
console_rx to have the value 1 for input to be accepted from Dom1. Which
in turn means your change to switch_serial_input(), suitably cleaned up,
is then likely the best we can do, despite me not really liking the shim
special casing.

As to cleaning up - besides the build, indentation, and style issues I
think you want to drop the "&& pv_shim" part of the condition (as
get_initial_domain_id() takes care of that already), and ideally you'd
also move the new "domid" variable into the more narrow scope. If you
don't feel like providing a proper (updated) patch, I'm happy to take
over, but to retain indication of your initial work I'd need you to
permit me to add your S-o-b (alongside mine).

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.