[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1



Hi,

On 18/10/2023 15:18, Simone Ballarin wrote:
Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects

This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
the initializer lists.

Looking at the code, I feel the commit message should be a bit more verbose because they are no apparent side-effects.


Function calls do not necessarily have side-effects, in these cases the
GCC pure or const attributes are added when possible.

You are only adding pure in this patch.


No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---
Function attributes pure and const do not need to be added as GCC
attributes, they can be added using ECLAIR configurations.
---
  xen/arch/arm/device.c              |  6 +++---
  xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c           | 12 ++++++++----
  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h |  2 +-
  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/device.c b/xen/arch/arm/device.c
index 1f631d3274..e9be078415 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/device.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/device.c
@@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ int handle_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node 
*dev, p2m_type_t p2mt,
      int res;
      paddr_t addr, size;
      bool own_device = !dt_device_for_passthrough(dev);
+    bool dev_is_hostbridge = is_pci_passthrough_enabled() &&
+                             device_get_class(dev) == DEVICE_PCI_HOSTBRIDGE;

The commit message suggests that the code is moved because there are side-effects. But none of them should have any side-effects.

In fact, if I am not mistaken, both is_pci_passthrough_enabled() and device_get_class() could be marked as pure.

      /*
       * We want to avoid mapping the MMIO in dom0 for the following cases:
       *   - The device is owned by dom0 (i.e. it has been flagged for
@@ -329,9 +331,7 @@ int handle_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node 
*dev, p2m_type_t p2mt,
      struct map_range_data mr_data = {
          .d = d,
          .p2mt = p2mt,
-        .skip_mapping = !own_device ||
-                        (is_pci_passthrough_enabled() &&
-                        (device_get_class(dev) == DEVICE_PCI_HOSTBRIDGE)),
+        .skip_mapping = !own_device || dev_is_hostbridge,
          .iomem_ranges = iomem_ranges,
          .irq_ranges = irq_ranges
      };
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c b/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c
index 6716b03561..3ec6743bf6 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c
@@ -109,27 +109,31 @@ static unsigned long copy_guest(void *buf, uint64_t addr, 
unsigned int len,
unsigned long raw_copy_to_guest(void *to, const void *from, unsigned int len)
  {
+    struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current;

It is not clear to me what is the perceived side effect here and the others below. Can you clarify?

      return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len,
-                      GVA_INFO(current), COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear);
+                      GVA_INFO(current_vcpu), COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear);
  }
unsigned long raw_copy_to_guest_flush_dcache(void *to, const void *from,
                                               unsigned int len)
  {
-    return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current),
+    struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current;
+    return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu),
                        COPY_to_guest | COPY_flush_dcache | COPY_linear);
  }
unsigned long raw_clear_guest(void *to, unsigned int len)
  {
-    return copy_guest(NULL, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current),
+    struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current;
+    return copy_guest(NULL, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu),
                        COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear);
  }
unsigned long raw_copy_from_guest(void *to, const void __user *from,
                                    unsigned int len)
  {
-    return copy_guest(to, (vaddr_t)from, len, GVA_INFO(current),
+    struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current;
+    return copy_guest(to, (vaddr_t)from, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu),
                        COPY_from_guest | COPY_linear);
  }
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h
index 6973eeb1d1..a66e28fefb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct cpu_info {
      uint32_t flags;
  };
-static inline struct cpu_info *get_cpu_info(void)
+static inline __attribute_pure__ struct cpu_info *get_cpu_info(void)
  {
  #ifdef __clang__
      unsigned long sp;

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.