[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v4 1/2] automation/eclair: make the docs for MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.1 visible to ECLAIR
- To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:02:32 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=N1TlKT31mJg1IgSmqjAkHVidRj94x4a7+YgkZYt3M2g=; b=PD6qR6ZUt79HdvITv4po8Hy0f9HfSxPN72wiw2JKLzA7WBOw33vhaIJK8rqm2gt/PySJ4Ec4Gms8x1Ysk7PdoL5boFp/KA1vDd/5pbn8Y7Z7M/espcXDx2pJmyLyvd7EXqLEwEYHUGMDxeArqZtHoyhGCF5Ho9rnZC3HTDvMe8PMS3dKlx4VrPXI1Jg1u1lP6Icj0Egpk/2Fkg0uNqg1LECCrnBsUnelRITSLRVWL7tORxZrjOvDSh1ZExoKVOeSLDx2soExMmyMzXs/P0HXZTUOwdwTk8SaZPbYdR8c4whowgVgbVBFEXck2BkqLehO5TdtEiDuBbd2UFSRVNvc4w==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=IpRF7xTn2y031mRkvKH41Um75HOPJL8EgV1uVnZCKRPtdSZOHdevykEzfc1e6O04p3QU02rfCrd/YAyVxFxOYRqoip3LzYQRT6UNLujxGFkMc547iRPxmtvnpY+bZwUf3+r2tPYe12NLea9UwZag3ZPkIh+zCS/uO+ndVOA6QOGrWCT/27ZMYFawaIwYYTtH8/djRdn75UEtoswfG5QaVf807b/6nIYi9N/GYROuEjjz6D8L5uIVCPrPx72tpYMcnKj9Az8oUaz/BDx0TvEfmJL0Sm9ySE5kzQiecKqSakrFdpI7CJZ0Hns1wNva/dnoJR9rURNCJjFvNQlXv6IwNw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx, Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:02:51 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 16.11.2023 09:45, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2023-11-15 12:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>> But I noticed you were using gcc-12 and originally thought it was a
>> mistake until I saw the second use.
>>
>> The advantage of a variable CC (and CXX) is you can add a comment on
>> top why you are specifically requestion gcc-12? IOW, why is gcc not
>> fine?
>>
>
> The assumptions in C-language-toolchain.rst (which are reflected in the
> analysis config) are using gcc-12 explicitly; that's just easier from a
> certification perspective to have a fixed version.
I'm wondering: Upstream Xen isn't going to undergo any certification
effort, aiui. Downstreams who want to do so may have good reasons to
choose a specific compiler version, which may well not be gcc12. How
are we meaning to deal with that?
Jan
|
