|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v10 14/17] xen/arm: translate virtual PCI bus topology for guests
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:09:18PM +0000, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
>
> There are three originators for the PCI configuration space access:
> 1. The domain that owns physical host bridge: MMIO handlers are
> there so we can update vPCI register handlers with the values
> written by the hardware domain, e.g. physical view of the registers
> vs guest's view on the configuration space.
> 2. Guest access to the passed through PCI devices: we need to properly
> map virtual bus topology to the physical one, e.g. pass the configuration
> space access to the corresponding physical devices.
> 3. Emulated host PCI bridge access. It doesn't exist in the physical
> topology, e.g. it can't be mapped to some physical host bridge.
> So, all access to the host bridge itself needs to be trapped and
> emulated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Since v9:
> - Commend about required lock replaced with ASSERT()
> - Style fixes
> - call to vpci_translate_virtual_device folded into vpci_sbdf_from_gpa
> Since v8:
> - locks moved out of vpci_translate_virtual_device()
> Since v6:
> - add pcidevs locking to vpci_translate_virtual_device
> - update wrt to the new locking scheme
> Since v5:
> - add vpci_translate_virtual_device for #ifndef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT
> case to simplify ifdefery
> - add ASSERT(!is_hardware_domain(d)); to vpci_translate_virtual_device
> - reset output register on failed virtual SBDF translation
> Since v4:
> - indentation fixes
> - constify struct domain
> - updated commit message
> - updates to the new locking scheme (pdev->vpci_lock)
> Since v3:
> - revisit locking
> - move code to vpci.c
> Since v2:
> - pass struct domain instead of struct vcpu
> - constify arguments where possible
> - gate relevant code with CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT
> New in v2
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++-
> xen/include/xen/vpci.h | 10 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> index 3bc4bb5508..58e2a20135 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> @@ -7,31 +7,55 @@
>
> #include <asm/mmio.h>
>
> -static pci_sbdf_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> - paddr_t gpa)
> +static bool_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(struct domain *d,
s/bool_t/bool/
> + const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> + paddr_t gpa, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
> {
> - pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> + ASSERT(sbdf);
>
> if ( bridge )
> {
> - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr);
> - sbdf.seg = bridge->segment;
> - sbdf.bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start;
> + sbdf->sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr);
> + sbdf->seg = bridge->segment;
> + sbdf->bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start;
> }
> else
> - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE);
> -
> - return sbdf;
> + {
> + bool translated;
> +
> + /*
> + * For the passed through devices we need to map their virtual SBDF
> + * to the physical PCI device being passed through.
> + */
> + sbdf->sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE);
> + read_lock(&d->pci_lock);
> + translated = vpci_translate_virtual_device(d, sbdf);
> + read_unlock(&d->pci_lock);
> +
> + if ( !translated )
> + {
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> + return true;
> }
I would make translated a top-level variable:
{
bool translated = true;
if ( bridge )
...
else
...
translated = vpci_translate_virtual_device(d, sbdf);
....
return translated;
}
As that IMO makes the logic easier to follow.
>
> static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> register_t *r, void *p)
> {
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p;
> - pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa);
> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */
> unsigned long data;
>
> + ASSERT(!bridge == !is_hardware_domain(v->domain));
> +
> + if ( !vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(v->domain, bridge, info->gpa, &sbdf) )
> + {
> + *r = ~0ul;
Uppercase suffixes.
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> if ( vpci_ecam_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
> 1U << info->dabt.size, &data) )
> {
> @@ -48,7 +72,12 @@ static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t
> *info,
> register_t r, void *p)
> {
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p;
> - pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa);
> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> +
> + ASSERT(!bridge == !is_hardware_domain(v->domain));
> +
> + if ( !vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(v->domain, bridge, info->gpa, &sbdf) )
> + return 1;
>
> return vpci_ecam_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
> 1U << info->dabt.size, r);
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> index 7c46a2d3f4..0dee5118d6 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,30 @@ static int add_virtual_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Find the physical device which is mapped to the virtual device
> + * and translate virtual SBDF to the physical one.
> + */
> +bool vpci_translate_virtual_device(const struct domain *d, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
> +{
> + const struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +
> + ASSERT(!is_hardware_domain(d));
> + ASSERT(rw_is_locked(&d->pci_lock));
> +
> + for_each_pdev ( d, pdev )
> + {
> + if ( pdev->vpci && (pdev->vpci->guest_sbdf.sbdf == sbdf->sbdf) )
> + {
> + /* Replace guest SBDF with the physical one. */
> + *sbdf = pdev->sbdf;
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT */
>
> void vpci_deassign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> @@ -175,7 +199,6 @@ int vpci_assign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> return rc;
> }
> -
> #endif /* __XEN__ */
>
> static int vpci_register_cmp(const struct vpci_register *r1,
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> index 4a53936447..e9269b37ac 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,16 @@ static inline bool __must_check
> vpci_process_pending(struct vcpu *v)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT
> +bool vpci_translate_virtual_device(const struct domain *d, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf);
> +#else
> +static inline bool vpci_translate_virtual_device(const struct domain *d,
> + pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
> +{
I think you want to add an ASSERT_UÇNREACHABLE() here, as I would
expect if there's no build in vPCI guest support we would never get
here?
Thanks, Roger.
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |