[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [linux-linus test] 183794: regressions - FAIL
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 22.11.23 04:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > > On 20.11.23 03:21, osstest service owner wrote: > > > > > flight 183794 linux-linus real [real] > > > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183794/ > > > > > > > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > > > > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > > > > including tests which could not be run: > > > > > test-arm64-arm64-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. > > > > > vs. > > > > > 183766 > > > > > > > > I'm seeing the following in the serial log: > > > > > > > > Nov 20 00:25:41.586712 [ 0.567318] kernel BUG at > > > > arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.c:164! > > > > Nov 20 00:25:41.598711 [ 0.574002] Internal error: Oops - BUG: > > > > 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > > > > > > > The related source code lines in the kernel are: > > > > > > > > ········err = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info, > > > > xen_vcpu_nr(cpu), > > > > ································ &info); > > > > ········BUG_ON(err); > > > > > > > > I suspect commit 20f3b8eafe0ba to be the culprit. > > > > > > > > Stefano, could you please have a look? > > > > The good news and bad news is that I cannot repro this neither with nor > > without CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0. I looked at commit 20f3b8eafe0ba but > > I cannot see anything wrong with it. Looking at the register dump, from: > > > > x0 : fffffffffffffffa > > > > I am guessing the error was -ENXIO which is returned from map_guest_area > > in Xen. > > > > Could it be that the struct is crossing a page boundary? Or that it is > > not 64-bit aligned? Do we need to do something like the following? > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > index 9afdc4c4a5dc..5326070c5dc0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > @@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void) > > * for secondary CPUs as they are brought up. > > * For uniformity we use VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info even on cpu0. > > */ > > - xen_vcpu_info = alloc_percpu(struct vcpu_info); > > + xen_vcpu_info = __alloc_percpu(struct vcpu_info, PAGE_SIZE); > > if (xen_vcpu_info == NULL) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > May I suggest to use a smaller alignment? What about: > > 1 << fls(sizeof(struct vcpu_info) - 1) See below --- [PATCH] arm/xen: fix xen_vcpu_info allocation alignment xen_vcpu_info is a percpu area than needs to be mapped by Xen. Currently, it could cross a page boundary resulting in Xen being unable to map it: [ 0.567318] kernel BUG at arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.c:164! [ 0.574002] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Fix the issue by using __alloc_percpu and requesting alignment for the memory allocation. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c index 9afdc4c4a5dc..09eb74a07dfc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void) * for secondary CPUs as they are brought up. * For uniformity we use VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info even on cpu0. */ - xen_vcpu_info = alloc_percpu(struct vcpu_info); + xen_vcpu_info = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct vcpu_info), + 1 << fls(sizeof(struct vcpu_info) - 1)); if (xen_vcpu_info == NULL) return -ENOMEM;
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |