[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] xen/asm-generic: introduce generic device.h
On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 15:28 -0600, Shawn Anastasio wrote: > Hi Oleksii, > > On 11/27/23 8:13 AM, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/Makefile > > b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/Makefile > > index ece7fa66dd..df4c1ebb08 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/Makefile > > +++ b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/Makefile > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > +generic-y += device.h > > generic-y += paging.h > > generic-y += vm_event.h > > diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/device.h > > b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/device.h > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 8253e61d51..0000000000 > > --- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/device.h > > +++ /dev/null > > @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@ > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > -#ifndef __ASM_PPC_DEVICE_H__ > > -#define __ASM_PPC_DEVICE_H__ > > - > > -enum device_type > > -{ > > - DEV_DT, > > - DEV_PCI, > > -}; > > - > > -struct device { > > - enum device_type type; > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE > > - struct dt_device_node *of_node; /* Used by drivers imported > > from Linux */ > > -#endif > > -}; > > - > > -enum device_class > > -{ > > - DEVICE_SERIAL, > > - DEVICE_IOMMU, > > - DEVICE_PCI_HOSTBRIDGE, > > - /* Use for error */ > > - DEVICE_UNKNOWN, > > -}; > > - > > -struct device_desc { > > - /* Device name */ > > - const char *name; > > - /* Device class */ > > - enum device_class class; > > - /* List of devices supported by this driver */ > > - const struct dt_device_match *dt_match; > > - /* > > - * Device initialization. > > - * > > - * -EAGAIN is used to indicate that device probing is > > deferred. > > - */ > > - int (*init)(struct dt_device_node *dev, const void *data); > > -}; > > - > > -typedef struct device device_t; > > - > > -#define DT_DEVICE_START(name_, namestr_, > > class_) \ > > -static const struct device_desc __dev_desc_##name_ > > __used \ > > -__section(".dev.info") = > > { \ > > - .name = > > namestr_, \ > > - .class = > > class_, \ > > - > > -#define > > DT_DEVICE_END \ > > -}; > > - > > -#endif /* __ASM_PPC_DEVICE_H__ */ > > diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/irq.h > > b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/irq.h > > index 5c37d0cf25..49193fddff 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/irq.h > > +++ b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/irq.h > > @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ > > #define __ASM_PPC_IRQ_H__ > > > > #include <xen/lib.h> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE > > I realize that you were likely following PPC's device.h which also > checks CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE, but I'm not sure that it makes sense > to > check this conditional in PPC code at all -- we will always have > HAS_DEVICE_TREE (selected by PPC) and I can't imagine a scenario > where > this will ever not be the case. What about case if ACPI is used? Does ACPI is supported by PPC? But if you are sure that CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE will be always selected then I am OK to remove this change. > > Unless Jan (or someone else) disagrees, I'd rather this conditional > be > dropped inside of PPC code. I'll double check but I think I had a compilation issue if it isn't defined. > > > #include <xen/device_tree.h> > > +#endif > > #include <public/device_tree_defs.h> > > > > /* TODO */ > > @@ -25,9 +27,11 @@ static inline void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu > > *v) > > BUG_ON("unimplemented"); > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE > > Ditto. > > > static inline int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node > > *device, int index) > > { > > BUG_ON("unimplemented"); > > } > > +#endif > > > > #endif /* __ASM_PPC_IRQ_H__ */ Thanks. ~ Oleksii
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |