[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 5/5] xen/arm: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 11.8
Hi, On 24/11/2023 17:29, Simone Ballarin wrote: From: Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx> Add or amend casts to comply with Rule 11.8. The violations are resolved either: - by adding a missing const qualifier in the cast - by removing a cast to non-const on a const-qualified object No functional change. Signed-off-by: Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/include/asm/regs.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index 2dd2926b41..c17214f738 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -2749,7 +2749,7 @@ static int __init handle_passthrough_prop(struct kernel_info *kinfo, if ( node == NULL ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Couldn't find node %s in host_dt!\n", - (char *)xen_path->data); + xen_path->data); I am a little bit puzzled why the cast was originally added here. Stefano, do you remember? Also, this hunk will not apply on staging (the code has moved to dom0less-build.c). This will want a new version. return -EINVAL; }diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.hindex 64314d59b3..517216d2a8 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static always_inline void write_atomic_size(volatile void *p, */ static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) { - return *(volatile int *)&v->counter; + return *(const volatile int *)&v->counter; }static inline int _atomic_read(atomic_t v)diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/regs.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/regs.h index 8a0db95415..79050937f3 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/regs.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/regs.h @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline bool regs_mode_is_32bit(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)static inline bool guest_mode(const struct cpu_user_regs *r){ - unsigned long diff = (char *)guest_cpu_user_regs() - (char *)(r); + unsigned long diff = (char *)guest_cpu_user_regs() - (const char *)(r); NIT: I would take the opportunity to use 'const char*' for the first one as well. /* Frame pointer must point into current CPU stack. */ ASSERT(diff < STACK_SIZE); /* If not a guest frame, it must be a hypervisor frame. */ Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |