Re: [XEN PATCH 2/2] x86/p2m: address a violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3

[Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/12/23 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.11.2023 16:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > Make function declaration and definition consistent changing
> > parameter name from "gpfn" to "gfn".
> > For consistency, rename also "old_gpfn" to "old_gfn".
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > This patch depends on patch 1/2 of the same series.
> There's no need to state this, btw. Within a series later patches depending
> on earlier ones if the default. There instead it can help committers if it
> is made clear when patches do not depend on one another (and hence can be
> committed in a order different from the submission's).
Thanks for the information.

--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)