[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd_inode directly from other modules
- To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:54:15 -0800
- Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, colyli@xxxxxxx, kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxx, vigneshr@xxxxxx, sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hoeppner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, clm@xxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, nico@xxxxxxxxxxx, xiang@xxxxxxxxxx, chao@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxxx, konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx, p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcachefs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gfs2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx, yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 05:55:13 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis
> to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can
> be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c).
What tree is this against? It fails to apply to either Jens'
for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.
|
