[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 16/39] xen/riscv: introduce asm/smp.h
On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 16:43 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.11.2023 11:30, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > > +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_SMP_H > > +#define __ASM_RISCV_SMP_H > > + > > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > +#include <xen/cpumask.h> > > +#include <xen/percpu.h> > > +#endif > > If you want this to be possible to include from assembly files (I > don't > know why you would want that), ... > > > +DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_mask); > > +DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_mask); > > ... these two would also need to live inside the #ifdef. Otherwise > the > #ifdef wants dropping. I think we can just drop $ifdef. I am not sure that this header will be used in assembly code. > > > +#define cpu_is_offline(cpu) unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu)) > > Seeing this is now the 4th instance, I guess we want to move it to > xen/smp.h. I'll try to remember making a patch. It will be nice. Thanks. > > > +/* > > + * Do we, for platform reasons, need to actually keep CPUs online > > when we > > + * would otherwise prefer them to be off? > > + */ > > +#define park_offline_cpus false > > + > > +/* TODO: need to be implemeted */ > > +#define smp_processor_id() (0) > > + > > +#endif > > \ No newline at end of file > > You want to take care of this. Sure. I'll add a newline. Thanks for noticing that. > ~ Oleksii
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |