[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 8/9] xen: add deviations for Rule 11.8


  • To: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:46:07 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:46:18 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 14.12.2023 13:07, Simone Ballarin wrote:
> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> @@ -292,6 +292,18 @@ constant expressions are required.\""
>  # Series 11
>  #
>  
> +-doc_begin="Violations caused by container_of are due to pointer arithmetic 
> operations
> +with the provided offset. The resulting pointer is then immediately cast 
> back to its
> +original type, which preserves the qualifier. This use can be deemed as safe.
> +Fixing this violation would require to increase code complexity and lower 
> readability."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.8,reports+={safe,"any_area(any_loc(any_exp(macro(^container_of$))))"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="This function is made to explicitly cast an error-valued pointer 
> to a void
> +pointer type to make it clear that's what's going on, so the violation is 
> deliberate."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.8,reports+={deliberate,"all_area(context(^ERR_CAST\\(.*$))"}
> +-doc_end

While the wording is okay here, ...

> --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> @@ -248,6 +248,19 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
>         If no bits are set, 0 is returned.
>       - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
>  
> +   * - R11.8
> +     - Violations caused by container_of are due to pointer arithmetic 
> operations
> +       with the provided offset. The resulting pointer is then immediately 
> cast back to its
> +       original type, which preserves the qualifier. This use can be deemed 
> as safe.
> +       Fixing this violation would require to increase code complexity and 
> lower readability.
> +     - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +    
> +   * - R11.8
> +     - This function is made to explicitly cast an error-valued pointer to a
> +       void pointer type to make it clear that's what's going on, so the
> +       violation is deliberate.
> +     - Tagged ad `deliberate` for ECLAIR.

... "This function" here is entirely unclear. However, seeing ERR_CAST() has
no users, wouldn't we be better off simply removing it? (Otherwise, nit:
"Tagged as ...".)

Jan




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.