[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clang-format configuration discussion - pt 2
- To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:59:21 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=1YuDH++bEzz3T34mEndM8RJn2G9YNBCwjmYXZmnPo18=; b=n9Cqzv6KEA9mhMJm9MzigfeKmj6u3ZrgQWSIJHru/YZD1QxJcOPvj5pVMv1X0Fekdk0VCqLgzhw+tpEy+OC1pNojBrAttePpUHPFNx5GZdyYNuBPKIzmaXw2Win4zCrV5s2ov19quJpVcFTjyTCyFb4JBEI48WdNJZ6z889htHmXM7DQkUS+hSV6xlpjU/rFXiTf6Y7/EUFnNgmnuC6bDNJlHKx00tVLdqLKwFeYRQ3D2laGtk2DYlknqSKHOZgMIWLd/XDeSxcYNA2LrcvevTQjG+4zainigCH5Pjq7T3XuRz8f6zppALAuwNVkGQGiHYR1N6vdHmbr8ya4pWNmuQ==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=1YuDH++bEzz3T34mEndM8RJn2G9YNBCwjmYXZmnPo18=; b=PKHHyg5+onTCpiRP0A8yHV6NEzUrWrgxIsj7eGG66CX8uesxJz2L/dBFXCeLS6WkQTE98cc6v7/EZ0SwvzAcWXB0Voz40Y0e7jdLFju5zIjZbpKUsShTq1uSo51LpIx5wt9Cuf2RT31696Qag7j1aI2aKTJ8i9TVGxpPVqDFxqH2dE52C3NENNZUyIKrVudO+pyZyci1sBVRArdjiymR2ImLYy0PSvjkndardLAL53k6hjME/cW7rPuIdJIpNtwQZ+0ZcrlrfWTJmsHMQgKMDLlACttcHHqOvekSrAMSyjuptppZqYXUOp1NHpzuqAhANjDo0z9KeCBsf4rE4GcWMQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=MEsokCjiubrnzXDLxd42t7HaIqbfuahXfKfHUCKK7FqhV+bnJ0Z4v8mHAgZfQUmBkf86Y+bbAMc4LYkiPQ7sTifnkRFzgL9bM6IV36ojtXUwlY34p9HP8FcKJHoEpRSSlLummIPZRjeQKiohiYgpr9l8wwbkznyP0J+yyQP65Coih4lPl5oVg55Y9veAtSthgROy/4Wth20CIh5hbdwpShBblnSTzRjv3kTXoTCcElxug1vJeX6+75yhhbe5Iq+C3dup8yB9uQq9uPzomls/lC12jMeBk+Mi14wcl0Vunqg7a4nsCV5RJjVcee18AWL//EC10/akz01ZN4aCYw4AqQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ao7iVUlAlJG2YpdAAaGNOnKbHGrzSHQZTJh5Ny+vD975azncJ/Z5r5QULddx7HI60qVIoxWUBsXTwRolF5WaRJEWk8c9k4PBQYoo6bLbMWBB0NU9FOvJRQqS8D8171dmtgXdEvXN2/muGZIs9aMfakwE2DiRyuMPzHqiyzYLQTYrmzwd+hZE7aBM3A6RfadqhcC8DA71bm0XQ+lgY+Ey7wwaIqgTtgaxFfKb3llzzPAzi1oF+rRPgBDyk+rEgwIPwud7mVtcodJHYeaMeB2G3+EkIYVgQLV9hzZu1wfA5w4Y/Ed5nXc0vR79h8frIDZ4L3oSzfAzwdWWgVHv7f8Q1w==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <Michal.Orzel@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 18:00:07 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHaHhwDfni7SbjBtk6S7YLD/w4HebCaxpCAgAAF/YCAANA+AIABAccAgADjFACAABTvAIAp2VwAgAkMmQA=
- Thread-topic: Clang-format configuration discussion - pt 2
>
>>>> I found the way we dealt with MISRA rules quite helpful. We had a weekly
>>>> meeting to discuss some of the rules and then the outcome was posted on
>>>> the ML. Maybe we should do the same here? Any other suggestion how to
>>>> move?
>>>
>>> I have mixed feelings with meetings like the Misra ones. That's probably
>>> unavoidable because of it being a goal to move fast. I'm not sure the
>>> same applies here.
>>
>> I think in this situation is less about moving fast but more about making a
>> closure of the 3 years+ discussion about the coding style.
>
> Exactly. The meeting is useful to find alignment in a more fruitful way.
>
> We don't have many MISRA rules left to discuss anyway. We could discuss
> the codestyle changes after MISRA or in parallel.
Hi Stefano,
this is a very good idea, discussing that in a meeting would ease a lot the
explanation for the clang-format configurable.
Cheers,
Luca
|
