[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 21/34] xen/riscv: introduce p2m.h



Hi Jan,

On 12/01/2024 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.01.2024 11:39, Julien Grall wrote:
On 22/12/2023 15:13, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in V3:
   - add SPDX
   - drop unneeded for now p2m types.
   - return false in all functions implemented with BUG() inside.
   - update the commit message
---
Changes in V2:
   - Nothing changed. Only rebase.
---
   xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h   |   3 +-
   xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h

diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
index 25ba054668..3bc05b7c05 100644
--- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
@@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ static inline void memory_type_changed(struct domain *d)
   static inline int guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand(struct domain *d, 
unsigned long gfn,
                                                           unsigned int order)
   {
-    BUG_ON("unimplemented");
-    return 1;
+    return -EOPNOTSUPP;
   }
static inline int guest_physmap_add_entry(struct domain *d,
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d270ef6635
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_P2M_H__
+#define __ASM_RISCV_P2M_H__
+
+#include <asm/page-bits.h>
+
+#define paddr_bits PADDR_BITS
+
+/*
+ * List of possible type for each page in the p2m entry.
+ * The number of available bit per page in the pte for this purpose is 4 bits.
+ * So it's possible to only have 16 fields. If we run out of value in the
+ * future, it's possible to use higher value for pseudo-type and don't store
+ * them in the p2m entry.
+ */

This looks like a verbatim copy from Arm. Did you actually check RISC-V
has 4 bits available in the PTE to store this value?

+typedef enum {
+    p2m_invalid = 0,    /* Nothing mapped here */
+    p2m_ram_rw,         /* Normal read/write guest RAM */

s/guest/domain/ as this also applies for dom0.

+} p2m_type_t;
+
+#include <xen/p2m-common.h>
+
+static inline int get_page_and_type(struct page_info *page,
+                                    struct domain *domain,
+                                    unsigned long type)
+{
+    BUG();

I understand your goal with the BUG() but I find it risky. This is not a
problem right now, it is more when we will decide to have RISC-V
supported. You will have to go through all the BUG() to figure out which
one are warrant or not.

To reduce the load, I would recommend to switch to ASSERT_UNREACHABLE()
(or maybe introduced a different macro) that would lead to a crash on
debug build but propagate the error normally on production build.

Elsewhere BUG_ON("unimplemented") is used to indicate such cases.
Can't this be used here (and then uniformly elsewhere) as well?

I would prefer something that can be compiled out in production build. But I would be Ok with BUG_ON("...") this is at least clearer than a plain BUG().

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.