[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 21/34] xen/riscv: introduce p2m.h
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 17:11 -0600, Shawn Anastasio wrote: > Hi Oleksii, > > On 12/22/23 9:13 AM, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in V3: > > - add SPDX > > - drop unneeded for now p2m types. > > - return false in all functions implemented with BUG() inside. > > - update the commit message > > --- > > Changes in V2: > > - Nothing changed. Only rebase. > > --- > > xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h | 3 +- > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h | 102 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h > > b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h > > index 25ba054668..3bc05b7c05 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h > > +++ b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h > > @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ static inline void memory_type_changed(struct > > domain *d) > > static inline int guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand(struct > > domain *d, unsigned long gfn, > > unsigned > > int order) > > { > > - BUG_ON("unimplemented"); > > - return 1; > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > > > > Was this change included by mistake? I'm not sure why this patch > should > touch PPC's p2m.h. I think you are right. It's mistake. RISC-V has the similar p2m.h so I faulty changed PPC version too. Thanks. ~ Oleksii
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |