[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH v2 2/3] x86/uaccess: replace __{get,put}_user_bad() with STATIC_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE()


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:38:35 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:38:42 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 07.02.2024 02:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.01.2024 11:05, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> @@ -208,7 +205,7 @@ do {                                                    
>>>                    \
>>>      case 8:                                                                
>>> \
>>>          put_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "q",  "", "ir", errret);       
>>> \
>>>          break;                                                             
>>> \
>>> -    default: __put_user_bad();                                             
>>> \
>>> +    default: STATIC_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();                                  
>>> \
>>>      }                                                                      
>>> \
>>>      clac();                                                                
>>> \
>>>  } while ( false )
>>> @@ -227,7 +224,7 @@ do {                                                    
>>>                    \
>>>      case 2: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "w", "=r", errret); break; 
>>> \
>>>      case 4: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "k", "=r", errret); break; 
>>> \
>>>      case 8: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval,  "", "=r", errret); break; 
>>> \
>>> -    default: __get_user_bad();                                             
>>> \
>>> +    default: STATIC_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();                                  
>>> \
>>>      }                                                                      
>>> \
>>>      clac();                                                                
>>> \
>>>  } while ( false )
>>
>> Related to my remark on patch 1 - how is one to know the macro this was
>> invoked from, when seeing the resulting diagnostic?
> 
> I am not sure what do you mean here... we do get an error like the
> following (I added a STATIC_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE for case 4):
> 
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:262: Error: static assertion failed: 
> unreachable

Right - and how do I know what _user_ of the macro actually triggered
it? ISTR suggesting to use one or more of __FILE__ / __LINE__ /
__FUNCTION__ here, for that specific purpose ...

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.