[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN v4 1/3] xen/arm: Introduce CONFIG_PARTIAL_EMULATION and "partial-emulation" cmd option
Hi Michal, On 07/02/2024 11:52, Michal Orzel wrote: On 07/02/2024 11:06, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Michal, On 07/02/2024 07:45, Michal Orzel wrote:On 06/02/2024 19:49, Julien Grall wrote:On 31/01/2024 12:10, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:There can be situations when the registers cannot be emulated to their full functionality. This can be due to the complexity involved. In such cases, one can emulate those registers as RAZ/WI for example. We call them as partial emulation. Some registers are non-optional and as such there is nothing preventing an OS from accessing them. Instead of injecting undefined exception (thus crashing a guest), one may want to prefer a partial emulation to let the guest running (in some cases accepting the fact that it might result in unwanted behavior). A suitable example of this (as seen in subsequent patches) is emulation of DBGDTRTX_EL0 (on Arm64) and DBGDTRTXINT(on Arm32). These non-optional registers can be emulated as RAZ/WI and they can be enclosed within CONFIG_PARTIAL_EMULATION. Further, "partial-emulation" command line option allows us to enable/disable partial emulation at run time. While CONFIG_PARTIAL_EMULATION enables support for partial emulation at compile time (i.e. adds code for partial emulation), this option may be enabled or disabled by Yocto or other build systems. However if the build system turns this option on, users can use scripts like Imagebuilder to generate uboot-script which will append "partial-emulation=false" to xen command line to turn off the partial emulation. Thus, it helps to avoid rebuilding xen. By default, "CONFIG_PARTIAL_EMULATION=y" and "partial-emulation=false". This is done so that Xen supports partial emulation. However, customers are fully aware when they enable partial emulation. It's important to note that enabling such support might result in unwanted/non-spec compliant behavior.Can you remind me why this is built by default? In particular...This is the result of RFC discussion we had, where both Bertrand and Stefano agreed on having the Kconfig enabled by default to improve user experience: Bertrand: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/C0ADC33B-1966-4D3E-B081-A3AA0C3AE76D@xxxxxxx/ Stefano: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2312081514450.1703076@ubuntu-linux-20-04-desktop/Thanks for the pointer. I thought a bit more and per-se the default of the Kconfig doesn't really matter too much. So I am fine to keep it on by default. That said, I think we need to detail the security support for the command line in SUPPORT.md. I think we want to consider to not security support any issue that would allow the userland to attack the guest OS due to a bug in the partial emulation. I would be fine with security supporting any issue that would DoS/compromise Xen.Sounds good to me. Something like: ### ARM/Partial emulation Enable partial emulation of registers, otherwise considered unimplemented, that would normally trigger a fault injection. Status: Supported, with caveats Bugs allowing the userspace to attack the guest OS will not be considered security vulnerabilities. Bugs that could compromise Xen will be considered security vulnerabilities. LGTM. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |