[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH 1/9] x86/boot: choose AP stack based on APIC ID


  • To: Krystian Hebel <krystian.hebel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 17:11:30 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:11:39 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 14.11.2023 18:49, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S
> @@ -72,6 +72,26 @@ trampoline_protmode_entry:
>          mov     $X86_CR4_PAE,%ecx
>          mov     %ecx,%cr4
>  
> +        /*
> +         * Get APIC ID while we're in non-paged mode. Start by checking if
> +         * x2APIC is enabled.
> +         */
> +        mov     $MSR_APIC_BASE, %ecx
> +        rdmsr
> +        and     $APIC_BASE_EXTD, %eax

You don't use the result, in which case "test" is to be preferred over
"and".

> +        jnz     .Lx2apic
> +
> +        /* Not x2APIC, read from MMIO */
> +        mov     0xfee00020, %esp

Please don't open-code existing constants (APIC_ID here and below,
APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE just here, and ...

> +        shr     $24, %esp

... a to-be-introduced constant here (for {G,S}ET_xAPIC_ID() to use as
well then). This is the only way of being able to easily identify all
pieces of code accessing the same piece of hardware.

> +        jmp     1f
> +
> +.Lx2apic:
> +        mov     $(MSR_X2APIC_FIRST + (0x20 >> 4)), %ecx
> +        rdmsr
> +        mov     %eax, %esp
> +1:

Overall I'm worried of the use of %esp throughout here.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S
> @@ -15,7 +15,33 @@ ENTRY(__high_start)
>          mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4,%rcx
>          mov     %rcx,%cr4
>  
> -        mov     stack_start(%rip),%rsp
> +        test    %ebx,%ebx

Nit (style): Elsewhere you have blanks after the commas, just here
(and once again near the end of the hunk) you don't.

> +        cmovz   stack_start(%rip), %rsp
> +        jz      .L_stack_set
> +
> +        /* APs only: get stack base from APIC ID saved in %esp. */
> +        mov     $-1, %rax

Why a 64-bit insn here and ...

> +        lea     x86_cpu_to_apicid(%rip), %rcx
> +1:
> +        add     $1, %rax

... here, when you only use (far less than) 32-bit values?

> +        cmp     $NR_CPUS, %eax
> +        jb      2f
> +        hlt
> +2:
> +        cmp     %esp, (%rcx, %rax, 4)
> +        jne     1b

Aren't you open-coding REPNE SCASD here?

> +        /* %eax is now Xen CPU index. */
> +        lea     stack_base(%rip), %rcx
> +        mov     (%rcx, %rax, 8), %rsp
> +
> +        test    %rsp,%rsp
> +        jnz     1f
> +        hlt
> +1:
> +        add     $(STACK_SIZE - CPUINFO_sizeof), %rsp

Even this post-adjustment is worrying me. Imo the stack pointer is
better set exactly once, to its final value. Keeping it at its init
value of 0 until then yields more predictable results in case it
ends up being used somewhere.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> @@ -1951,6 +1951,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>       */
>      if ( !pv_shim )
>      {
> +        /* Separate loop to make parallel AP bringup possible. */
>          for_each_present_cpu ( i )
>          {
>              /* Set up cpu_to_node[]. */
> @@ -1958,6 +1959,12 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>              /* Set up node_to_cpumask based on cpu_to_node[]. */
>              numa_add_cpu(i);
>  
> +            if ( stack_base[i] == NULL )
> +                stack_base[i] = cpu_alloc_stack(i);
> +        }

Imo this wants accompanying by removal of the allocation in
cpu_smpboot_alloc(). Which would then make more visible that there's
error checking there, but not here (I realize there effectively is
error checking in assembly code, but that'll end in HLT with no
useful indication of what the problem is). Provided, as Julien has
pointed out, that the change is necessary in the first place.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.