[PATCH v3 4/4] x86/spec: do not print thunk option selection if not built-in

[Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Now that the thunk built-in enable is printed as part of the "Compiled-in
support:" line, avoid printing anything in "Xen settings:" if the thunk is
disabled at build time.

Note the BTI-Thunk option printing is also adjusted to print a colon in the
same way the other options on the line do.

Requested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v3:
 - New in this version.
---
 xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c
index ca82b9e41ccd..e8b0e62adba4 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c
@@ -504,11 +504,12 @@ static void __init print_details(enum ind_thunk thunk)
                "\n");
 
     /* Settings for Xen's protection, irrespective of guests. */
-    printk("  Xen settings: BTI-Thunk %s, SPEC_CTRL: %s%s%s%s%s, 
Other:%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
-           thunk == THUNK_NONE      ? "N/A" :
-           thunk == THUNK_RETPOLINE ? "RETPOLINE" :
-           thunk == THUNK_LFENCE    ? "LFENCE" :
-           thunk == THUNK_JMP       ? "JMP" : "?",
+    printk("  Xen settings: %s%sSPEC_CTRL: %s%s%s%s%s, Other:%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
+           thunk != THUNK_NONE      ? "BTI-Thunk: " : "",
+           thunk == THUNK_NONE      ? "" :
+           thunk == THUNK_RETPOLINE ? "RETPOLINE, " :
+           thunk == THUNK_LFENCE    ? "LFENCE, " :
+           thunk == THUNK_JMP       ? "JMP, " : "?, ",
            (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRSB) &&
             !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS))         ? "No" :
            (default_xen_spec_ctrl & SPEC_CTRL_IBRS)  ? "IBRS+" :  "IBRS-",
-- 
2.43.0