[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 4/4] x86: prefer shadow stack for producing call traces


  • To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:53:21 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:53:27 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Shadow stacks contain little more than return addresses, and they in
particular allow precise call traces also without FRAME_POINTER.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
While the 'E' for exception frames is probably okay, I'm not overly
happy with the 'C' (for CET). I would have preferred 'S' (for shadow),
but we use that character already.

As an alternative to suppressing output for the top level exception
frame, adding the new code ahead of the 'R' output line (and then also
ahead of the stack top read) could be considered.

Perhaps having a printk() for the PV entry case is meaningless, for
- no frame being pushed when entered from CPL=3 (64-bit PV),
- no entry possible from CPL<3 (32-bit PV disabled when CET is active)?
In which case the comment probably should just be "Bogus." and the code
merely be "break;".

Quite likely a number of other uses of is_active_kernel_text() also want
amending with in_stub().

--- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
@@ -449,6 +449,11 @@ unsigned long get_stack_dump_bottom(unsi
     }
 }
 
+static bool in_stub(unsigned long addr)
+{
+    return !((this_cpu(stubs.addr) ^ addr) >> STUB_BUF_SHIFT);
+}
+
 #if !defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
 
 /*
@@ -539,6 +544,50 @@ static void show_trace(const struct cpu_
          !is_active_kernel_text(tos) )
         printk("   [<%p>] R %pS\n", _p(regs->rip), _p(regs->rip));
 
+    if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_SHSTK) && rdssp() != SSP_NO_SHSTK )
+    {
+        const unsigned long *ptr = _p(regs->entry_ssp);
+        unsigned int n;
+
+        for ( n = 0; (unsigned long)ptr & (PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*ptr)); ++n )
+        {
+            unsigned long val = *ptr;
+
+            if ( is_active_kernel_text(val) || in_stub(val) )
+            {
+                /* Normal return address entry.  */
+                printk("   [<%p>] C %pS\n", _p(val), _p(val));
+                ++ptr;
+            }
+            else if ( !((val ^ *ptr) >> (PAGE_SHIFT + STACK_ORDER)) )
+            {
+                if ( val & (sizeof(val) - 1) )
+                {
+                    /* Most likely a supervisor token. */
+                    break;
+                }
+
+                /*
+                 * Ought to be a hypervisor interruption frame.  But don't
+                 * (re)log the current frame's %rip.
+                 */
+                if ( n || ptr[1] != regs->rip )
+                    printk("   [<%p>] E %pS\n", _p(ptr[1]), _p(ptr[1]));
+                ptr = _p(val);
+            }
+            else
+            {
+                /* Ought to be a PV guest hypercall/interruption frame.  */
+                printk("   %04lx:[<%p>] E\n", ptr[2], _p(ptr[1]));
+                ptr = 0;
+            }
+        }
+
+        /* Fall back to legacy stack trace if nothing was logged at all. */
+        if ( n )
+            return;
+    }
+
     if ( fault )
     {
         printk("   [Fault on access]\n");




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.