[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/misra/rules.rst: add rule 16.6 and 20.12
On 2024-03-01 02:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Hi all, This patch broke gitlab-ci. The jobs failing are the cppcheck jobs. xen/scripts/xen-analysis.py --run-cppcheck --cppcheck-misra -- -j80 No summary for rule 20.12WARNING: Can't open /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/drivers/video/font_8x14.c: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x9f in position 7228: invalid start byte WARNING: Can't open /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/drivers/video/font_8x16.c: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x80 in position 5436: invalid start byte WARNING: Can't open /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/drivers/video/font_8x8.c: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x80 in position 4410: invalid start byteERROR: An error occured when running:/builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/tools/convert_misra_doc.py -i /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/docs/misra/rules.rst -o /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/cppcheck-misra.txt -j /builds/xen-project/hardware/xen/xen/cppcheck-misra.jsonI'll look into it as soon as possible. On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Stefano Stabellini wrote:Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> --- docs/misra/rules.rst | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/misra/rules.rst b/docs/misra/rules.rst index 182331089d..c185366966 100644 --- a/docs/misra/rules.rst +++ b/docs/misra/rules.rst @@ -478,6 +478,12 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. adhere to Rule 16.2 would result in increased complexity and maintenance difficulty, and could potentially introduce bugs.+ * - `Rule 16.6 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_16_06.c>`_+ - Required + - Every switch statement shall have at least two switch-clauses + - Single-clause switches are allowed when they do not involve a + default label. +* - `Rule 16.7 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_16_07.c>`_- Required - A switch-expression shall not have essentially Boolean type @@ -554,6 +560,13 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. evaluation -+ * - `Rule 20.12 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_20_12.c>`_+ - A macro parameter used as an operand to the # or ## operators,+ which is itself subject to further macro replacement, shall only+ be used as an operand to these operators + - Required + - Variadic macros are allowed to violate the rule. + I think here it wants the strictness "Required" first, and then the headline second "A macro parameter..." * - `Rule 20.13 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_20_13.c>`_- Required - A line whose first token is # shall be a valid preprocessing -- 2.25.1 -- Nicola Vetrini, BSc Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |