Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] IOMMU: store name for extra reserved device memory

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:40:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.03.2024 17:25, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > It will be useful for error reporting in a subsequent patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In principle
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> However, ...
> 
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ struct extra_reserved_range {
> >      unsigned long start;
> >      unsigned long nr;
> >      pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> > +    const char *name;
> >  };
> 
> ... to me "descr" (or the longer "description") would seem more suitable.
> Thoughts?

I'm happy either way, but I don't find 'name' odd.

Thanks, Roger.