[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Serious AMD-Vi(?) issue
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:41:45PM +0000, Kelly Choi wrote: > > I can see you've recently engaged with our community with some issues you'd > like help with. > We love the fact you are participating in our project, however, our > developers aren't able to help if you do not provide the specific details. Please point to specific details which have been omitted. Fairly little data has been provided as fairly little data is available. The primary observation is large numbers of: (XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT: DDDD:bb:dd.f d0 addr ffffff???????000 flags 0x8 I Lines in Xen's ring buffer. I recall spotting 3 messages from Linux's SATA driver (which weren't saved due to other causes being suspected), which would likely be associated with hundreds or thousands of the above log messages. I never observed any messages from the NVMe subsystem during that phase. The most overt sign was telling the Linux kernel to scan for inconsistencies and the kernel finding some. The domain didn't otherwise appear to notice trouble. This is from memory, it would take some time to discover whether any messages were missed. Present mitigation action is inhibiting the messages, but the trouble is certainly still lurking. -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sigmsg@xxxxxxx PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |