[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: docs/misra: add R21.6 R21.14 R21.15 R21.16


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Bagnara <roberto.bagnara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:53:18 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:53:29 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 16.04.2024 21:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Also add two specific project-wide deviations for R21.6 and R21.15.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/docs/misra/deviations.rst b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> index 32b02905d1..9123c8edb5 100644
> --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> @@ -387,6 +387,22 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
>         of the Rule due to uses of this macro.
>       - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
>  
> +   * - R21.6
> +     - The use of snprintf() and vsnprintf() is justifiable as, despite
> +       the fact that such functions have the same names of the
> +       corresponding standard library functions, each configuration of
> +       Xen has a unique implementation for them; the code implementing
> +       such functions is subject to the analysis, so that any undefined
> +       or unspecified behavior associated to them falls under the
> +       responsibility of other MISRA guidelines

Checking the Misra spec, I'm actually surprised a deviation is needed. The
rule's rationale talks about streams and file I/O only. Why would the string
formatting functions be covered then at all? They also don't have, afaik,
any undefined or implementation defined behavior.

> +     - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> +   * - R21.15
> +     - The use of void* arguments is justifiable as the rationale for
> +       the rule is to indicate possible mistakes, and void* is
> +       frequently used in Xen to represent virtual memory addresses

But that doesn't rule out mistakes. Are there actually examples in the
code base?

Additionally I wonder (a) whether the rule actually needs an exception
and thus (b) whether the deviation isn't instead for 21.16. As to (a) I
understand the rule is worded slightly differently than what would
strictly be needed to permit void*, but the general rule in C is that
void* is compatible with all other pointers (suitably qualified as
needed, of course) anyway.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.