[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH v2] automation/eclair: add deviations for MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.4
On 24/04/24 10:30, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.04.2024 10:25, Federico Serafini wrote:Update ECLAIR configuration to take into account the deviations agreed during MISRA meetings for Rule 16.4. Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 8 ++++++++ docs/misra/deviations.rst | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)So what has changed here from v1? It looks all the same to me, with it still remaining unclear what exactly ...--- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst @@ -334,6 +334,19 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules: - /\* Fallthrough \*/ - /\* Fallthrough. \*/+ * - R16.4+ - Switch statements having a controlling expression of enum type + deliberately do not have a default case: gcc -Wall enables -Wswitch + which warns (and breaks the build as we use -Werror) if one of the enum + labels is missing from the switch. + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR. + + * - R16.4 + - A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default label may + be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is considered to + improve readability. + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR. + * - R16.6 - A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default label may be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is considered to... a "switch clause" is. I would define a switch clause as: "the non-empy list of statements which follows a non-empty list of case/default labels". If you agree, I will place it near the occurrences of the term "switch clause". -- Federico Serafini, M.Sc. Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |