[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v2 5/5] xen/arm: ffa: support notification
Hi Bertrand & Jens,
On 24/04/2024 07:53, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Jens,
On 23 Apr 2024, at 17:26, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 1:40 PM Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jens,
This is not a full review of the code. I will let Bertrand doing it.
On 22/04/2024 08:37, Jens Wiklander wrote:
+void ffa_notif_init(void)
+{
+ const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs arg = {
+ .a0 = FFA_FEATURES,
+ .a1 = FFA_FEATURE_SCHEDULE_RECV_INTR,
+ };
+ struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs resp;
+ unsigned int irq;
+ int ret;
+
+ arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp);
+ if ( resp.a0 != FFA_SUCCESS_32 )
+ return;
+
+ irq = resp.a2;
+ if ( irq >= NR_GIC_SGI )
+ irq_set_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
+ ret = request_irq(irq, 0, notif_irq_handler, "FF-A notif", NULL);
If I am not mistaken, ffa_notif_init() is only called once on the boot
CPU. However, request_irq() needs to be called on every CPU so the
callback is registered every where and the interrupt enabled.
I know the name of the function is rather confusing. So can you confirm
this is what you expected?
Good catch, no this wasn't what I expected. I'll need to change this.
[...]
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h
index 98236cbf14a3..ef8ffd4526bd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#define FFA_RET_DENIED -6
#define FFA_RET_RETRY -7
#define FFA_RET_ABORTED -8
+#define FFA_RET_NO_DATA -9
/* FFA_VERSION helpers */
#define FFA_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT 16U
@@ -97,6 +98,18 @@
*/
#define FFA_MAX_SHM_COUNT 32
+/*
+ * TODO How to manage the available SGIs? SGI 8-15 seem to be entirely
+ * unused, but that may change.
Are the value below intended for the guests? If so, can they be moved in
public/arch-arm.h along with the others guest interrupts?
Yes, I'll move it.
+ *
+ * SGI is the preferred delivery mechanism. SGIs 8-15 are normally not used
+ * by a guest as they in a non-virtualized system typically are assigned to
+ * the secure world. Here we're free to use SGI 8-15 since they are virtual
+ * and have nothing to do with the secure world.
Do you have a pointer to the specification?
There's one at the top of arch/arm/tee/ffa.c,
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0077/e
Do you want the link close to the defines when I've moved them to
public/arch-arm.h?
Or is it perhaps better to give a link to "Arm Base System
Architecture v1.0C", https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0094/
instead?
I would say we need the link to Arm Base System Architecture in arch-arm.
+1
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|