[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 02/26] sd: move zone limits setup out of sd_read_block_characteristics
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:20:54 +0900
- Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph B??hmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@xxxxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monn?? <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:21:24 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 6/11/24 2:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:51:24PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> - if (lim->zoned)
>>> + if (sdkp->device->type == TYPE_ZBC)
>>
>> Nit: use sd_is_zoned() here ?
>
> Yes.
>
>>> - if (!sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
>>> + if (!sd_is_zoned(sdkp)) {
>>> + lim->zoned = false;
>>
>> Maybe we should clear the other zone related limits here ? If the drive is
>> reformatted/converted from SMR to CMR (FORMAT WITH PRESET), the other zone
>> limits may be set already, no ?
>
> blk_validate_zoned_limits already takes care of that.
I do not think it does:
static int blk_validate_zoned_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
{
if (!lim->zoned) {
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_open_zones) ||
WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_active_zones) ||
WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->zone_write_granularity) ||
WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_zone_append_sectors))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
...
So setting lim->zoned to false without clearing the other limits potentially
will trigger warnings...
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
|