[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/irq: restrict CPU movement in set_desc_affinity()
On 10.06.2024 16:20, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > If external interrupts are using logical mode it's possible to have an overlap > between the current ->arch.cpu_mask and the provided mask (or TARGET_CPUS). > If > that's the case avoid assigning a new vector and just move the interrupt to a > member of ->arch.cpu_mask that overlaps with the provided mask and is online. What I'm kind of missing here is an explanation of why what _assign_irq_vector() does to avoid unnecessary migration (very first conditional there) isn't sufficient. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c > @@ -837,19 +837,38 @@ void cf_check irq_complete_move(struct irq_desc *desc) > > unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) > { > - int ret; > - unsigned long flags; > cpumask_t dest_mask; > > if ( mask && !cpumask_intersects(mask, &cpu_online_map) ) > return BAD_APICID; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > - ret = _assign_irq_vector(desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); > + /* > + * mask input set can contain CPUs that are not online. To decide > whether > + * the interrupt needs to be migrated restrict the input mask to the CPUs > + * that are online. > + */ > + if ( mask ) > + cpumask_and(&dest_mask, mask, &cpu_online_map); > + else > + cpumask_copy(&dest_mask, TARGET_CPUS); Why once &cpu_online_map and once TARGET_CPUS? > - if ( ret < 0 ) > - return BAD_APICID; > + /* > + * Only move the interrupt if there are no CPUs left in ->arch.cpu_mask > + * that can handle it, otherwise just shuffle it around ->arch.cpu_mask > + * to an available destination. > + */ "an available destination" (singular) gives the impression that it's only ever going to be a single CPU. Yet cpu_mask_to_apicid_flat() and cpu_mask_to_apicid_x2apic_cluster() can produce sets of multiple CPUs. Therefore maybe "an available destination / the (sub)set of available destinations"? Or as that's getting longish "(an) available destination(s)"? > + if ( !cpumask_intersects(desc->arch.cpu_mask, &dest_mask) ) > + { > + int ret; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > + ret = _assign_irq_vector(desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); Why not pass dest_mask here, as you now calculate that up front? The function will skip offline CPUs anyway. > @@ -862,6 +881,7 @@ unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, > const cpumask_t *mask) > cpumask_copy(&dest_mask, desc->arch.cpu_mask); > } > cpumask_and(&dest_mask, &dest_mask, &cpu_online_map); > + ASSERT(!cpumask_empty(&dest_mask)); > > return cpu_mask_to_apicid(&dest_mask); I wonder whether the assertion wouldn't better live in cpu_mask_to_apicid() itself (the macro, not the backing functions). Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |