[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement
- To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, oe-lkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lkp@xxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx, feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx, fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:32:27 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance
> improvement
> but a regression now. is this expected?
Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data
integrity. I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly
expected.
|
