[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.19] xen/bitmap: amend MISRA C deviation for Rule 20.7
On 09.07.2024 11:34, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > As noticed in the gitlab analyses, deviating bitmap_switch > for Rule 20.7 in this way does not work for ECLAIR. > > Instead, the deviation should be put in the macro invocation. Why is this? I ask in particular because ... > --- a/xen/include/xen/bitmap.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/bitmap.h > @@ -103,18 +103,16 @@ extern int bitmap_allocate_region(unsigned long > *bitmap, int pos, int order); > #define bitmap_switch(nbits, zero, small, large) \ > unsigned int n__ = (nbits); \ > if (__builtin_constant_p(nbits) && !n__) { \ > - /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ \ > zero; \ > } else if (__builtin_constant_p(nbits) && n__ <= BITS_PER_LONG) { \ > - /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ \ > small; \ > } else { \ > - /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ \ > large; \ > } > > static inline void bitmap_zero(unsigned long *dst, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = 0UL, > memset(dst, 0, bitmap_bytes(nbits))); > @@ -139,6 +137,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_fill(unsigned long *dst, > unsigned int nbits) > static inline void bitmap_copy(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src, > unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = *src, > memcpy(dst, src, bitmap_bytes(nbits))); > @@ -147,6 +146,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_copy(unsigned long *dst, const > unsigned long *src, > static inline void bitmap_and(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = *src1 & *src2, > __bitmap_and(dst, src1, src2, nbits)); > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_and(unsigned long *dst, const > unsigned long *src1, > static inline void bitmap_or(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = *src1 | *src2, > __bitmap_or(dst, src1, src2, nbits)); > @@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_or(unsigned long *dst, const > unsigned long *src1, > static inline void bitmap_xor(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = *src1 ^ *src2, > __bitmap_xor(dst, src1, src2, nbits)); > @@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_xor(unsigned long *dst, const > unsigned long *src1, > static inline void bitmap_andnot(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long > *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = *src1 & ~*src2, > __bitmap_andnot(dst, src1, src2, nbits)); > @@ -179,6 +182,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_andnot(unsigned long *dst, > const unsigned long *src1, > static inline void bitmap_complement(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long > *src, > unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits,, > *dst = ~*src & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits), > __bitmap_complement(dst, src, nbits)); > @@ -187,6 +191,7 @@ static inline void bitmap_complement(unsigned long *dst, > const unsigned long *sr > static inline int bitmap_equal(const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits, > return -1, > return !((*src1 ^ *src2) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits)), > @@ -196,6 +201,7 @@ static inline int bitmap_equal(const unsigned long *src1, > static inline int bitmap_intersects(const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits, > return -1, > return ((*src1 & *src2) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits)) != 0, > @@ -205,6 +211,7 @@ static inline int bitmap_intersects(const unsigned long > *src1, > static inline int bitmap_subset(const unsigned long *src1, > const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits, > return -1, > return !((*src1 & ~*src2) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits)), > @@ -213,6 +220,7 @@ static inline int bitmap_subset(const unsigned long *src1, > > static inline int bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *src, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits, > return -1, > return !(*src & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits)), > @@ -221,6 +229,7 @@ static inline int bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *src, > unsigned int nbits) > > static inline int bitmap_full(const unsigned long *src, unsigned int nbits) > { > + /* SAF-7-safe Rule 20.7 non-parenthesized macro argument */ > bitmap_switch(nbits, > return -1, > return !(~*src & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits)), ... having the same comment on every invocation is naturally quite a bit less desirable. So far I was under the impression that macro-specific deviations can be dealt with by marking the macro definition accordingly. I've been assuming this is a general pattern. If it isn't, would you please first clarify what Eclair's specific requirements are for a SAF marker to take effect when involving a macro? Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |