[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add libfuzzer target to fuzz/x86_instruction_emulator
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:35:53 -0400
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=tklengyel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmarc=pass header.from=<tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1720542991; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=p/u/+fBt1SwANb2RqCF6Y/pSfgKgopUbXlXta3Cvzqs=; b=Lxp6ImaGMIaEFC4WzcgrPfxVlEeCN1QaLRWA143tMDpDDwichJAbkQraQiL53aUtRNjcD8Xi5bDjq1tG2Wi8QzxcB8+mqmUdF3dX1X7xSCCccxkicCpBWRRKKySdGggPA9DlkGRh3/ZOcXXVyS/BeSEPSMB7VEimbjhR4zCxKt4=
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1720542991; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=knV+5OV4BQg91kOijfXALhvXlepf4gEMflTX1zKdZ9/JbfRCHRw0xV+7AsBHtK8quqZy/Cpp5Ik+vFX2zooQ5dJFeNv2ZUxHxab/UlWrLPZcmvvKAJtDQYMFk4LKFzv/bK5YofAAX2jkxs4VBMOoIFLiKF5DKVRWRs1pa4BCfLI=
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 16:36:54 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 12:12 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09.07.2024 17:37, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 6:47 PM Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> This target enables integration into oss-fuzz. Changing invalid input
> >> return
> >> to -1 as values other then 0/-1 are reserved by libfuzzer. Also adding the
> >> missing __wrap_vsnprintf wrapper which is required for successful oss-fuzz
> >> build.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Patch ping.
>
> It's on my list of things to look at, yet even if fully ack-ed it couldn't
> go in right now anyway.
Thanks, just wanted to make sure it's not lost.
Tamas
|
