Re: [Resend XEN PATCH v4 0/9] x86: address some violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3

[Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/07/24 08:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.07.2024 18:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > This patch series fixes a missing escape in a deviation and addresses some
> > violations.
> >
> > Federico Serafini (9):
> >    automation/eclair: fix deviation of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/cpuid: use fallthrough pseudo keyword
> >    x86/domctl: address a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/vpmu: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/traps: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/mce: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/hvm: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> >    x86/mm: add defensive return
> >    x86/mpparse: address a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.3
> And what exactly was this resend about? Even sent as reply to the original
> submission, rather than as a plain new thread, thus resulting in everything
> being mixed up into a single thread?
I'm sorry I forgot to add the maintainers in the first patch series,
so I resent it.

--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)