Re: [PATCH] xen/printk: Avoid the use of L as a length modifier

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Coverity complains about it being invalid.  It turns out that it is a GCC-ism
> to treat ll and L equivalently.  C99 only permits L to mean long double.
> 
> Convert all uses of L in to alternatives, either l, ll or PRI.64 depending on
> the operand type.  This in turn removes some unnecessary casts which look to
> predate us having correct PRI* constants.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Coverity-IDs: 1464224, 1464228, 1464248, 1464261, 1464272, 1464281, 1464287, 
> 1464290, 1494437
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>