[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] xen/riscv: enable GENERIC_BUG_FRAME
On Mon, 2024-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.08.2024 15:54, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Enable GENERIC_BUG_FRAME to support BUG(), WARN(), ASSERT, > > and run_in_exception_handler(). > > > > The 0x0000 opcode is used for BUG_INSTR, which, when macros from > > <xen/bug.h> are used, triggers an exception with the > > ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION cause. > > This opcode is encoded as a 2-byte instruction and is invalid if > > CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C is enabled or not. > > Yes, but there's a caveat: Without the C extension instructions have > to be aligned on 32-bit boundaries. You can't just go and insert a > 16-bit item there. When RISCV_ISA_C is not set, I think you want to > insert two such 16-bit zeroes. Beware of an alignment handling bug > in the assembler - don't think of using an alignment directive here. Then probably it will be better to define BUG_INSTR as: #define BUG_INSTR "UNIMP" and let compiler to provide proper opcode. Or define BUG_INSTRT always as 0x00000000 will be better? > > > > --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@ > > > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > > > -#define BUG_INSTR "ebreak" > > +#include <xen/stringify.h> > > + > > +#define BUG_OPCODE 0x0000 > > You don't really use this other than ... > > > +#define BUG_INSTR ".hword " __stringify(BUG_OPCODE) > > ... here - does this really warrant a separate #define _and_ > inclusion of > stringify.h? > > Furthermore you want to avoid using .hword (or any data generating > directive), to avoid disturbing disassembly. Please use .insn if at > all > possible. I understand though that in certain cases you won't be able > to > use .insn. Yet for the common case (more recent binutils) you'd still > better avoid .hword or alike, imo. > > > @@ -103,7 +104,29 @@ static void do_unexpected_trap(const struct > > cpu_user_regs *regs) > > > > void do_trap(struct cpu_user_regs *cpu_regs) > > { > > - do_unexpected_trap(cpu_regs); > > + register_t pc = cpu_regs->sepc; > > + unsigned long cause = csr_read(CSR_SCAUSE); > > + > > + switch ( cause ) > > + { > > + case CAUSE_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION: > > + if ( do_bug_frame(cpu_regs, pc) >= 0 ) > > + { > > + if ( !(is_kernel_text(pc) || is_kernel_inittext(pc)) ) > > + { > > + printk("Something wrong with PC: %#lx\n", pc); > > + die(); > > + } > > + > > + cpu_regs->sepc += GET_INSN_LENGTH(*(uint16_t *)pc); > > + > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + default: > > The falling-through here wants annotating, preferably with the > pseudo- > keyword. What kind of pseudo-keyword? I though about /* goto default */ to underline that CAUSE_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION should be close to "default:". ~ Oleksii > > + do_unexpected_trap(cpu_regs); > > + break; > > + } > > } >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |