[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feasture
- To: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 08:30:02 +0200
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 06:30:12 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Actually I meant, we can extend the virtio_config_ops to allow mapping
> ops there, then simulator and VDUSE can hook the map ops there.
>From a quick glance that feels like the right layer of abstraction,
although the config part of the name feels wrong at that point.
|
