[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xen Project statistics help
Thanks both. I'll look to see what's possible, although if anyone could help automate this monthly that would be greatly helpful! Many thanks, Kelly Choi
Community Manager Xen Project
On 16.08.2024 20:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> xen.biterg.io was created by a company called Bitergia. Bitergia was
> later contracted by the Linux Foundation to create a generic dashboard
> for all their Open Source projects. Getting access to the Linux
> Foundation dashboard is the best way to go (if it comes to no cost to
> our project).
>
> I have used scripts like these in the past to get some data out of a
> release. You can copy/paste the output to an Excel datasheet to do
> further calculations there.
>
> # List of contributors by name (using the commit "Author" tag) for the
> # 4.19 release. One name per commit.
> git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --format='%aN' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
>
> # List of reviewers (using the Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags) for the
> # 4.19 release. One name per review.
> git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --pretty=format:%b | grep -E "Reviewed-by|Acked-by" | sed -E 's/.*(Reviewed-by|Acked-by):\s*(.*)\s*<.*/\2/' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
Just to mention it: Going by tags here doesn't come anywhere close to the
actual work put into reviewing, even when leaving aside the obvious
difference between small, large but mechanical, and large+intrusive
changes. Imo unlike commit stats, review stats would better be collected
from the mailing list.
Jan
|
