[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feature v2
- To: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:27:44 +0200
- Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michael S . Tsirkin " <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 07:27:54 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
I've pulled this into the dma-mapping for-next tree, although I'd
love to see one of the vdpa maintainers look over patch 1. I'm
pretty sure it's correct, but a confirmation would be good.
|
