[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] arm/div64: Drop do_div() macro for GCC version < 4
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, Michal Orzel wrote: > As stated in README, the minimum supported GCC version for arm32 is > 4.9, therefore drop the custom do_div() macro in favor of using the > optimized version. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > To be merged after: > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20240902100355.3032079-2-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx > --- > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 16 ---------------- > 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h > b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h > index da1f1fcbd503..8fe17f0ff27c 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h > @@ -54,20 +54,6 @@ > __rem; \ > }) > > -#if __GNUC__ < 4 > - > -/* > - * gcc versions earlier than 4.0 are simply too problematic for the > - * optimized implementation below. First there is gcc PR 15089 that > - * tend to trig on more complex constructs, spurious .global __udivsi3 > - * are inserted even if none of those symbols are referenced in the > - * generated code, and those gcc versions are not able to do constant > - * propagation on long long values anyway. > - */ > -#define do_div(n, base) __do_div_asm(n, base) > - > -#elif __GNUC__ >= 4 > - > #include <xen/bug.h> > > /* > @@ -217,8 +203,6 @@ > __r; \ > }) > > -#endif /* GCC version */ > - > #endif /* BITS_PER_LONG */ > > #endif > -- > 2.25.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |