[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] arm/div64: Drop do_div() macro for GCC version < 4



On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, Michal Orzel wrote:
> As stated in README, the minimum supported GCC version for arm32 is
> 4.9, therefore drop the custom do_div() macro in favor of using the
> optimized version.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> To be merged after:
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20240902100355.3032079-2-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h 
> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> index da1f1fcbd503..8fe17f0ff27c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> @@ -54,20 +54,6 @@
>       __rem;                                                  \
>  })
>  
> -#if __GNUC__ < 4
> -
> -/*
> - * gcc versions earlier than 4.0 are simply too problematic for the
> - * optimized implementation below. First there is gcc PR 15089 that
> - * tend to trig on more complex constructs, spurious .global __udivsi3
> - * are inserted even if none of those symbols are referenced in the
> - * generated code, and those gcc versions are not able to do constant
> - * propagation on long long values anyway.
> - */
> -#define do_div(n, base) __do_div_asm(n, base)
> -
> -#elif __GNUC__ >= 4
> -
>  #include <xen/bug.h>
>  
>  /*
> @@ -217,8 +203,6 @@
>       __r;                                                            \
>  })
>  
> -#endif /* GCC version */
> -
>  #endif /* BITS_PER_LONG */
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.