[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] xen/common: move device initialization code to common code


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:28:46 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:29:06 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 11.09.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/common/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HYPFS_CONFIG) += config_data.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CORE_PARKING) += core_parking.o
>  obj-y += cpu.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_TRACE) += debugtrace.o
> +obj-$(call or,$(CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE),$(CONFIG_HAS_ACPI)) += device.o

I can't spot any HAS_ACPI in the tree. And if this was switched to CONFIG_ACPI
I'd further ask why the file needs building on x86.

Also I think I'd prefer to avoid the of the "or" macro here:

obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += device.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE) += device.o

ought to be quite fine. There's de-duplication somewhere for what $(obj-y) 
lists.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/common/device.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Based on the code from:
> + *   xen/arch/arm/device.c
> + */
> +
> +#include <xen/bug.h>
> +#include <xen/device_tree.h>
> +#include <xen/errno.h>
> +#include <xen/init.h>
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/device.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +extern const struct acpi_device_desc _asdevice[], _aedevice[];

Why does this live separately here, rather than ...

> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE
> +
> +extern const struct device_desc _sdevice[], _edevice[];

... like this ...

> +int __init device_init(struct dt_device_node *dev, enum device_class class,
> +                       const void *data)
> +{
> +    const struct device_desc *desc;
> +
> +    ASSERT(dev != NULL);
> +
> +    if ( !dt_device_is_available(dev) || dt_device_for_passthrough(dev) )
> +        return  -ENODEV;
> +
> +    for ( desc = _sdevice; desc != _edevice; desc++ )
> +    {
> +        if ( desc->class != class )
> +            continue;
> +
> +        if ( dt_match_node(desc->dt_match, dev) )
> +        {
> +            ASSERT(desc->init != NULL);
> +
> +            return desc->init(dev, data);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return -EBADF;
> +}
> +
> +enum device_class device_get_class(const struct dt_device_node *dev)
> +{
> +    const struct device_desc *desc;
> +
> +    ASSERT(dev != NULL);
> +
> +    for ( desc = _sdevice; desc != _edevice; desc++ )
> +    {
> +        if ( dt_match_node(desc->dt_match, dev) )
> +            return desc->class;
> +    }
> +
> +    return DEVICE_UNKNOWN;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI

... in the section where it's needed? Leaving just one #ifdef for ACPI.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.