[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] xen/riscv: use {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_cpu() to define {read,write}_atomic()
On 13.09.2024 17:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > The functions {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_cpu() do not need to be memory-ordered > atomic operations in Xen, based on their definitions for other architectures. > > Therefore, {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_cpu() can be used instead of > {read,write}{b,w,l,q}(), allowing the caller to decide if additional > fences should be applied before or after {read,write}_atomic(). > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |