[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 14/44] x86/boot: transition relocation calculations to struct boot_module


  • To: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:44:07 -0400
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=apertussolutions.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmarc=pass header.from=<dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1728485050; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=cOW0L77wR5gRSNQX9YI4k4D4bGyAi2F9uxdtSswKClA=; b=JuctG/hdYKIunJHv298PHagNdjsYPjsvlO1/o9kZ30o3oo7yxL1v3j6OSDRXFJG7zSSWQxERTcyI5a7gecu+fN2odHrcpH8i9PAjeEV8te4c49/m3HTXLaXcwECYu+ypYvAnx5EKyK6XtudN7opr1B05bBf2l1+osKBArEndaY0=
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1728485050; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=NNowu4Seb+tiVurjnbL5f5P9KbRRPzJAHnT50Ps35P+dUyR/A5chY/DrSxTvvE7lnlpuqk5MDjxUjJtn/RBD+lkA+IerJExjzELnyNd3VK1O1Ctxr69nMa/HICcx94f5v1OU5i4HBPGOLOF+SwRS7hAmd62plDopVeelI0bFgxc=
  • Cc: christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 14:44:20 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10/7/24 16:44, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On 2024-10-06 17:49, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Use struct boot_module fields, start and size, when calculating the relocation address and size. It also ensures that early_mod references are kept in sync.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
index f968758048ed..4f540c461b26 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ void asmlinkage __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
              struct boot_module *bm = &bi->mods[j];
              unsigned long size;
-            size = PAGE_ALIGN(bm->headroom + bm->mod->mod_end);
+            size = PAGE_ALIGN(bm->headroom + bm->size);

Is there a mismatch from mod_end in PFNs to bm->size in bytes?  Or is mod_start in pfns and mod_end in bytes?

The conversion is the latter, mod_start is in PFN and mod_end is in bytes.

              if ( bi->mods[j].flags & BOOTMOD_FLAG_X86_RELOCATED )
                  continue;
@@ -1504,13 +1504,13 @@ void asmlinkage __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
              if ( s < end &&
                   (bm->headroom ||
-                  ((end - size) >> PAGE_SHIFT) > bm->mod->mod_start) )
+                  paddr_to_pfn(end - size) > paddr_to_pfn(bm->start)) )

Drop the paddr_to_pfn if both sides are now in bytes?

True, both are in addresses, will drop.

              {
-                move_memory(end - size + bm->headroom,
-                            (uint64_t)bm->mod->mod_start << PAGE_SHIFT,
-                            bm->mod->mod_end);
-                bm->mod->mod_start = (end - size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-                bm->mod->mod_end += bm->headroom;
+                move_memory(end - size + bm->headroom, bm->start, bm->size);
+                bm->start = (end - size);
+                bm->mod->mod_start = paddr_to_pfn(bm->start);
+                bm->size += bm->headroom;
+                bm->mod->mod_end = bm->size;
                  bm->flags |= BOOTMOD_FLAG_X86_RELOCATED;
              }
          }

@@ -1700,13 +1698,13 @@ void asmlinkage __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
      for ( i = 0; i < bi->nr_modules; ++i )
      {
-        set_pdx_range(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start,
-                      bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start +
-                      PFN_UP(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_end));
+        set_pdx_range(paddr_to_pfn(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start),
+                      paddr_to_pfn(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start) +

Shouldn't these be
     paddr_to_pfn(bi->mods[i].start)
?

Correct, will fix.

+                      PFN_UP(bi->mods[i].size));
          map_pages_to_xen(
-            (unsigned long)mfn_to_virt(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start),
-            _mfn(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_start),
-            PFN_UP(bi->mods[i].mod->mod_end), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
+            (unsigned long)maddr_to_virt(bi->mods[i].start),
+            maddr_to_mfn(bi->mods[i].start),
+            PFN_UP(bi->mods[i].size), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);

First argument should fit on same line as map_pages_to_xen().

If it fits, yes I will move it up.

v/r,
dps



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.