[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v5 3/3] x86/msi: fix locking for SR-IOV devices


  • To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:27:08 -0400
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0)
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=PoaEQUmZyPk/7lddPfXAooR8DtejrJ8pV0FXtQo30ts=; b=TTeE0mfofZhndQAj3DuR4GcsgcBHjkeL0QXIQ/gWZNj5p7kheOj4tszI4tnfxeJy0tvMCJdm/K77RtvqP0on81WLH7bUxvZb3qNXximTZVkr4rhoNGi/CvH+9UR1cHALxvjCyNRDmj3XaOOxSPEjG+aiNoMsbI5ZnJ13kpDn5yBlXKgDkFXEpw/Nesd9OYhxtE3nXGN5wSHISIJYcAC32+BdJR3J86/soeVhjLvkifOdeLlKHACaJNTfNvCm/q6+14bZuSQxQEyhU8MnfvqXc8ceCgS7yjguNsJaV6t+uac+14/I33zUDBCadnqWIYzIu8RuGEuwdcPUUh1470YI3g==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PwyIC8+3adm599ynvdRaYap1uzZK6fVFCY/ENpRkwuJJkUSBtdwhadjrxhLJCF/IGEOxuLuA0CdKvQ1+iqM1A4EpxX4SHCG/fVPifyTPv7qAY3lOxBPLrjOSJGrvyjyDMLotefYOCJFJIx6oZeIvW/w/FFkhBpJ4ZOfSaCklTRoiuUjIBorJIINVPrYOx9qr5Hn73xqQll27hB9QIJAMqtvgPrI2LP7C1eQrhr2i8SdXymfucZhHFyqgzWdNCf0epTogenSGmBArEvoLhzdfz8AKzvqHH2/Xd42vYybmFkDzvL4hlwU9fSg5YdGw8ad8jJFJ7oC5r0qS5iTptCp8oQ==
  • Cc: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:28:03 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

In commit 4f78438b45e2 ("vpci: use per-domain PCI lock to protect vpci
structure") a lock was moved from allocate_and_map_msi_pirq() to the
caller and changed from pcidevs_lock() to read_lock(&d->pci_lock).
However, one call path wasn't updated to reflect the change, leading to
a failed assertion observed under the following conditions:

* PV dom0
* Debug build (CONFIG_DEBUG=y) of Xen
* There is an SR-IOV device in the system with one or more VFs enabled
* Dom0 has loaded the driver for the VF and enabled MSI-X

(XEN) Assertion 'd || pcidevs_locked()' failed at drivers/passthrough/pci.c:535
(XEN) ----[ Xen-4.20-unstable  x86_64  debug=y  Not tainted ]----
...
(XEN) Xen call trace:
(XEN)    [<ffff82d040284da8>] R pci_get_pdev+0x4c/0xab
(XEN)    [<ffff82d040344f5c>] F arch/x86/msi.c#read_pci_mem_bar+0x58/0x272
(XEN)    [<ffff82d04034530e>] F arch/x86/msi.c#msix_capability_init+0x198/0x755
(XEN)    [<ffff82d040345dad>] F arch/x86/msi.c#__pci_enable_msix+0x82/0xe8
(XEN)    [<ffff82d0403463e5>] F pci_enable_msi+0x3f/0x78
(XEN)    [<ffff82d04034be2b>] F map_domain_pirq+0x2a4/0x6dc
(XEN)    [<ffff82d04034d4d5>] F allocate_and_map_msi_pirq+0x103/0x262
(XEN)    [<ffff82d04035da5d>] F physdev_map_pirq+0x210/0x259
(XEN)    [<ffff82d04035e798>] F do_physdev_op+0x9c3/0x1454
(XEN)    [<ffff82d040329475>] F pv_hypercall+0x5ac/0x6af
(XEN)    [<ffff82d0402012d3>] F lstar_enter+0x143/0x150

In read_pci_mem_bar(), the VF obtains the struct pci_dev pointer for its
associated PF to access the vf_rlen array. This array is initialized in
pci_add_device() and is only populated in the associated PF's struct
pci_dev.

Access the vf_rlen array via the link to the PF, and remove the
troublesome call to pci_get_pdev().

Fixes: 4f78438b45e2 ("vpci: use per-domain PCI lock to protect vpci structure")
Reported-by: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
---
Candidate for backport to 4.19
Patch #2 ("xen/pci: introduce PF<->VF links") is pre-requisite

v4->v5:
* split the PF<->VF links to a pre-requisite patch
* pass pci_sbdf_t to read_pci_mem_bar()
* use stdint.h types on changed lines
* re-add NULL check for pf_info in read_pci_mem_bar(), as pf_info could
  be NULL

v3->v4:
* handle case when PF is removed with VFs enabled, then re-added with
  VFs disabled

v2->v3:
* link from VF to PF's struct pci_dev *

v1->v2:
* remove call to pci_get_pdev()
---
 xen/arch/x86/msi.c            | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c |  8 +++++---
 xen/include/xen/pci.h         | 15 +++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
index fbb07fe821b5..254a403dfb51 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
@@ -662,34 +662,35 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
     return 0;
 }
 
-static u64 read_pci_mem_bar(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 bir, int vf)
+static uint64_t read_pci_mem_bar(pci_sbdf_t sbdf, uint8_t bir, int vf,
+                                 const struct pf_info *pf_info)
 {
+    uint16_t seg = sbdf.seg;
+    uint8_t bus = sbdf.bus, slot = sbdf.dev, func = sbdf.fn;
     u8 limit;
     u32 addr, base = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0;
     u64 disp = 0;
 
     if ( vf >= 0 )
     {
-        struct pci_dev *pdev = pci_get_pdev(NULL,
-                                            PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, slot, func));
         unsigned int pos;
         uint16_t ctrl, num_vf, offset, stride;
 
-        if ( !pdev )
+        if ( !pf_info )
             return 0;
 
-        pos = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev->sbdf, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV);
-        ctrl = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL);
-        num_vf = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF);
-        offset = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET);
-        stride = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE);
+        pos = pci_find_ext_capability(sbdf, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV);
+        ctrl = pci_conf_read16(sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL);
+        num_vf = pci_conf_read16(sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF);
+        offset = pci_conf_read16(sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET);
+        stride = pci_conf_read16(sbdf, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE);
 
         if ( !pos ||
              !(ctrl & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) ||
              !(ctrl & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_MSE) ||
              !num_vf || !offset || (num_vf > 1 && !stride) ||
              bir >= PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS ||
-             !pdev->vf_rlen[bir] )
+             !pf_info->vf_rlen[bir] )
             return 0;
         base = pos + PCI_SRIOV_BAR;
         vf -= PCI_BDF(bus, slot, func) + offset;
@@ -703,8 +704,8 @@ static u64 read_pci_mem_bar(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 
func, u8 bir, int vf)
         }
         if ( vf >= num_vf )
             return 0;
-        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pdev->vf_rlen) != PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS);
-        disp = vf * pdev->vf_rlen[bir];
+        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pf_info->vf_rlen) != PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS);
+        disp = vf * pf_info->vf_rlen[bir];
         limit = PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS;
     }
     else switch ( pci_conf_read8(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, slot, func),
@@ -813,6 +814,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
         int vf;
         paddr_t pba_paddr;
         unsigned int pba_offset;
+        const struct pf_info *pf_info;
 
         if ( !dev->info.is_virtfn )
         {
@@ -820,6 +822,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
             pslot = slot;
             pfunc = func;
             vf = -1;
+            pf_info = NULL;
         }
         else
         {
@@ -827,9 +830,14 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
             pslot = PCI_SLOT(dev->info.physfn.devfn);
             pfunc = PCI_FUNC(dev->info.physfn.devfn);
             vf = dev->sbdf.bdf;
+            if ( dev->virtfn.pf_pdev )
+                pf_info = &dev->virtfn.pf_pdev->physfn;
+            else
+                pf_info = NULL;
         }
 
-        table_paddr = read_pci_mem_bar(seg, pbus, pslot, pfunc, bir, vf);
+        table_paddr = read_pci_mem_bar(PCI_SBDF(seg, pbus, pslot, pfunc), bir,
+                                       vf, pf_info);
         WARN_ON(msi && msi->table_base != table_paddr);
         if ( !table_paddr )
         {
@@ -852,7 +860,8 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
 
         pba_offset = pci_conf_read32(dev->sbdf, msix_pba_offset_reg(pos));
         bir = (u8)(pba_offset & PCI_MSIX_BIRMASK);
-        pba_paddr = read_pci_mem_bar(seg, pbus, pslot, pfunc, bir, vf);
+        pba_paddr = read_pci_mem_bar(PCI_SBDF(seg, pbus, pslot, pfunc), bir, 
vf,
+                                     pf_info);
         WARN_ON(!pba_paddr);
         pba_paddr += pba_offset & ~PCI_MSIX_BIRMASK;
 
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
index 95a8ed850efd..8209efdebecf 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
         }
     }
 
-    if ( !pdev->info.is_virtfn && !pdev->vf_rlen[0] )
+    if ( !pdev->info.is_virtfn && !pdev->physfn.vf_rlen[0] )
     {
         unsigned int pos = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev->sbdf,
                                                    PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV);
@@ -748,7 +748,9 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
         {
             unsigned int i;
 
-            BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pdev->vf_rlen) != PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS);
+            BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pdev->physfn.vf_rlen) !=
+                                    PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS);
+
             for ( i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; )
             {
                 unsigned int idx = pos + PCI_SRIOV_BAR + i * 4;
@@ -763,7 +765,7 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
                     continue;
                 }
                 ret = pci_size_mem_bar(pdev->sbdf, idx, NULL,
-                                       &pdev->vf_rlen[i],
+                                       &pdev->physfn.vf_rlen[i],
                                        PCI_BAR_VF |
                                        ((i == PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS - 1) ?
                                         PCI_BAR_LAST : 0));
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/pci.h b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
index f9435b7f4eb9..12f1c599e467 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
@@ -156,11 +156,16 @@ struct pci_dev {
      * List entry if info.is_virtfn == true
      */
     struct list_head vf_list;
-    u64 vf_rlen[6];
-    struct {
-        /* Only populated for VFs (info.is_virtfn == true) */
-        const struct pci_dev *pf_pdev;        /* Link from VF to PF */
-    } virtfn;
+    union {
+        struct pf_info {
+            /* Only populated for PFs (info.is_virtfn == false) */
+            uint64_t vf_rlen[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
+        } physfn;
+        struct {
+            /* Only populated for VFs (info.is_virtfn == true) */
+            const struct pci_dev *pf_pdev;        /* Link from VF to PF */
+        } virtfn;
+    };
 
     /* Data for vPCI. */
     struct vpci *vpci;
-- 
2.47.0




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.