Re: [PATCH v3] xen: Remove dependency between pciback and privcmd

["Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>]

On 2024/10/12 10:22, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/10/11 20:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 11.10.24 05:42, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> Commit 2fae6bb7be32 ("xen/privcmd: Add new syscall to get gsi from dev")
>>> adds a weak reverse dependency to the config XEN_PRIVCMD definition, that
>>> dependency causes xen-privcmd can't be loaded on domU, because dependent
>>> xen-pciback isn't always be loaded successfully on domU.
>>>
>>> To solve above problem, remove that dependency, and do not call
>>> pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf() directly, instead add a hook in
>>> drivers/xen/apci.c, xen-pciback register the real call function, then in
>>> privcmd_ioctl_pcidev_get_gsi call that hook.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2fae6bb7be32 ("xen/privcmd: Add new syscall to get gsi from dev")
>>> Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Unfortunately I'm seeing a build breakage for the 32-bit x86 build.
Could you please attach the link or steps?
Then I can reproduce it, and validate it locally with new changes.

>>
>> Reason is that drivers/xen/acpi.c is being built for Dom0 only, so having
>> CONFIG_XEN_ACPI defined is not enough for ensuring the new functions are
>> present.
>>
>> I suggest to add a new CONFIG item CONFIG_XEN_DOM0_ACPI like
>>
>> config XEN_DOM0_ACPI
>>     def_bool y
>>     depends on XEN_ACPI && XEN_DOM0
>>
>> and then replace all CONFIG_XEN_ACPI instances in your patch with
>> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0_ACPI. This includes the use case in
>> privcmd_ioctl_pcidev_get_gsi().
> 
> How about add stubs for xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func and 
> xen_acpi_get_gsi_from_sbdf when "!CONFIG_XEN_DOM0" in acpi.h, like the other 
> functions in that file do.
> 
>>
>>
>> Juergen
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Jiqian Chen.